Messages

1121

General Mach Discussion / Re: Motors ramp up with each line of g code??

« on: May 18, 2007, 10:15:53 AM »

The P number is Output number 1-20
Sorry about that
Brian

1122

LazyCam (Beta) / Re: Okay I must be stupid (or losing my mind)

« on: May 18, 2007, 09:50:41 AM »

Use the Attach button on the forum   You need to click on the Additional Options to get to the Attachments.

I have no idea why you can't mail me I have been getting a ton of mail today...

1123

General Mach Discussion / Re: Motors ramp up with each line of g code??

« on: May 18, 2007, 09:45:08 AM »

Try this :

M3
M11 P1 (P is the signal number)
G0 X-05.000 Y00.00000 Z00.00000
G0 X-08.000 Y00.00000 Z00.00000
M10 P1
G0 X 00.000 Y00.00000 Z00.00000
M30

This will turn on and off outputs and never stop

Hope that helps
Brian

1124

General Mach Discussion / Re: Motors ramp up with each line of g code??

« on: May 18, 2007, 09:16:55 AM »

Please post what you are running for a program and we will see what we can do.
Thanks
Brian

1125

General Mach Discussion / Re: skipping steps

« on: May 18, 2007, 09:09:16 AM »

Not a problem We all have to start some place 

1126

General Mach Discussion / Re: Motors start then stop then contunue when Back Lash is enabled.

« on: May 18, 2007, 09:07:30 AM »

To speed up the time of the backlash correction set your lower your Shuttle time. it is under the General configs .

Thanks
Brian

1127

LazyCam (Beta) / Re: Okay I must be stupid (or losing my mind)

« on: May 18, 2007, 08:56:11 AM »

Attach both the files and I will give them a quick look

Thanks
Brian

1128

LazyCam (Beta) / Re: Okay I must be stupid (or losing my mind)

« on: May 17, 2007, 10:59:01 PM »

What is the F (Feedrate) in each file?
I think that is the problem

1129

LazyCam (Beta) / Re: Lcam 2.0...

« on: May 17, 2007, 09:54:28 PM »

Cool I think I have found a small bug in that code ... it should help (I hope)

1130

LazyCam (Beta) / Re: Lcam201 mill

« on: May 17, 2007, 09:53:28 PM »

We will look into that after we are done the rest of the interface stuff... I think we broke it

The Overhang is not needed and I think we are going to take it out soon.
Thanks
Brian