Hello
Guest
it is
May 24, 2025, 06:40:38 PM
Guest
Login
Register
Menu
Home
Help
Search
Login
Register
YouTube
Machsupport Forum
/
Mach Discussion
/
General Mach Discussion
/
Unwanted Step Pulses
« previous
next »
Print
Pages:
«
1
2
3
Go Down
Author
Topic: Unwanted Step Pulses (Read 15970 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Tweakie.CNC
9,287
Super Kitty
Re: Unwanted Step Pulses
«
Reply #20 on:
April 29, 2012, 12:58:01 PM »
Hi Alan,
My apologies, I did not mean to suggest that your software was not genuine I just wanted to clarify that you were not using trial or demo versions.
Tweakie
Logged
PEACE
RICH
7,427
Re: Unwanted Step Pulses
«
Reply #21 on:
April 29, 2012, 05:06:14 PM »
Good that you found the culprit Alan.........now I can go back to a good snooze.
RICH
Logged
fixittt
290
Re: Unwanted Step Pulses
«
Reply #22 on:
April 30, 2012, 09:00:34 PM »
Just found this thread. Glad you got it solved with the new lpt port.
I didnt see anything that listed any mach 3 settings. I am willing to bed that your original problem was the step and direction pulse width. I have seen this before a couple times. Mainly when running very large Gcodes with tons of Z axis moves.
Upping the step and direction pulse widths cured the problems.
Logged
kcib
74
Re: Unwanted Step Pulses
«
Reply #23 on:
May 01, 2012, 10:42:32 AM »
Hi Fixittt
thanks for your response , as a matter of curiosity could you tell me what settings you use on your "Z" axis ?? velocity and acceleration as well as pulse widths ?
Many thanks
Alan
Logged
cncjerry
3
Re: Unwanted Step Pulses
«
Reply #24 on:
May 02, 2012, 12:36:37 AM »
If it shows up again (now that I see it was fixed) I had a problem way back in releases that had to do with mach3 not handling a consecutive sequence of very small moves well. The cam software I was using for 3D surfaces was set to allow scallops of nothing higher than .0001". So there were a lot of very small moves that were stacked-up in the gcode and they were going plus/minus on all three axis. I can't remember what fixed it - maybe something to do with look ahead? I might have had backlash enabled to correct for .002" or something and maybe turned it off? It could have also been a release upgrade that fixed it. You might want to try a test where you make steps or blocks that are only a few mil high and in straight lines.
Jerry
«
Last Edit: May 02, 2012, 12:38:52 AM by cncjerry
»
Logged
Print
Pages:
«
1
2
3
Go Up
« previous
next »