I too use Metric mm and it is a bit time consuming to set up and test in metric, so I look forward to seeing it in Metric version.
Don't hold your breath then. Without some putting in their time (I guarantee you setting up an inch profile for a machine is way faster than writing this wizard) to do some real world test and give results in inch I highly doubt I will spend any more of my time adding metric.
So in your Wizard can you add a Maximum Velocity speed so when it writes the data to machine.ini it will replace all the higher numbers with this G-Code maximum?
Absolutely not. Setting the max speed any angle will go at to hold a tolerance has nothing at all to do with the feed rate you program. If your programed feed rate is lower than it can take the angle at....... it simply doesn't slow down because it doesn't have too to hold the tolerance. The speed capable does not in any way speed the feed rate up over the programmed feed rate. It will simply lower the speed in angles it needs too, it will never speed it up over programmed feed rate.
The angle is measured from current trajectory to next trajectory. Simply the difference of what it is doing now to what it will do next.
Previously I had selected Constant Velocity and then later found out about the Wizard, when I went into the Wizard for the first time all angles were 0 and the CV Feedrate On/Off button was set to Off, even though I had selected Constant Velocity in the Configuration Menu. So the way I see it is selecting Constant Velocity in the Configuration menu actually does nothing unless you change the settings in the Wizard, is that right?
Not exactly but enabling CV in general config. does not populate the CV_Feed rate table in any way, therefore you are not taking advantage of that added feature until you populate the table.
My plan was to set 0 degrees to the full feed rate I generally use and then gradually decrease the feedrates and probably have 0 in a lot of the tighter angles
You can populate the table any way you want, what ever works for you. That is kind of the way the last version works. I can't imagine a scenario that this version is not far superior though. This version is much smarter.