Sure it can be explained YOUR MACHINE cannot run at the values you have selected for accelleration .
(;-) TP
You're missing the point there. Yes, obvious a real machine could not sustain 400 ipm and do the run in 7.2 min. The question is, does the real-world acceleration limits really require the 33.5 min runtime?
The analysis is actually showing NO. It's showing the run is being limited by something in Mach3's software which is NOT ipm OR acceleration and thus not physically necessary. The runtime is about 50% higher than it should be with the conservative acceleration limits for an actual machine.
There was never an intent to ask "why can't I run it at 10g acceleration". Rather, to see how much of the overhead is coming from acceleration. The results show that the runtime overhead isn't scaling with acceleration limits- so it's not originating from acceleration limits at all. At from the look of it, that 10 min physically unnecessary "mystery overhead" is slowing down the actual run with conservative accelerations by ~10 min.