- #1

regan1

- 5

- 0

so

mg>mgcosθ

mgcosθ=r

r>rcosθ

so

mg>rcosθ

then how can mg=rcos when banking in curved road?

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter regan1
- Start date

In summary: PLUS the force of the road's acceleration (in the 'downhill' direction). So, in reality, the reaction force can be much greater than either of those two forces.

- #1

regan1

- 5

- 0

so

mg>mgcosθ

mgcosθ=r

r>rcosθ

so

mg>rcosθ

then how can mg=rcos when banking in curved road?

Physics news on Phys.org

- #2

cepheid

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 5,199

- 38

mg cannot be equal to rcos(theta) simply on dimensional grounds. The former is a force, and the latter is a length. Could you post the equations that you are having trouble with more carefully and in greater detail?

For a banked curve, if you look at the road in cross-section, it is essentially like an inclined plane, with the "downhill" direction being the direction towards the centre of the circle. In the absence of friction, the only two forces that act on the car are gravity, and the normal force from contact with the road, which can contribute to the centripetal force. This should be helpful to you as a starting point for working out the force balance equations.

- #3

jbriggs444

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 12,821

- 7,478

When a physicist or mathematician sees "r cos θ" the automatic impulse is to read the "r" as radius, however that does not appear to be the intended reading in this case.

mg > mg cos θ... yes, that's true.

mg cos θ = r... no, that's false.

The correct version is mg = r cos θ

That seems to be the problem; a multiplication where division was called for.

- #4

AlephZero

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 6,982

- 299

This means that the reaction force r can be bigger than the weight of the car.

- #5

regan1

- 5

- 0

AlephZero said:

This means that the reaction force r can be bigger than the weight of the car.

Is not R the reaction force and how can Reaction force be greater than the weight of the car ?

In my opinion the maximum value that R can have is equal to the weight of the car. But since it is a slanted surface it is always less than mg

- #6

jbriggs444

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 12,821

- 7,478

regan1 said:Is not R the reaction force and how can Reaction force be greater than the weight of the car ?

In my opinion the maximum value that R can have is equal to the weight of the car. But since it is a slanted surface it is always less than mg

By "weight of the car", I assume that you mean the mass of the car times the force of gravity. (If, instead, you mean the increased apparent weight of the car due to centrifugal force plus the force of gravity then clearly the weight of the car is exactly equal to the reaction force R).

AlephZero has it right. The force of the road on the car must be able to both support the car against gravity and accelerate the car in its circular path -- it must be equal to the vector sum of those two components. That means that its magnitude is greater than either one of those components individually. It must be both greater than mg and greater than mv^2/radius.

I'm not clear on why you are calling this a "reaction force".

- #7

regan1

- 5

- 0

while banking the car in a curved road from where does the car get the force to balance it's weight and force to balance it's centrifugal force. As far as i know that force is given by the reaction force of the car's weight itself. and when you divide the reaction force into it's component forces- one force is directed toward the center which provide the centripetal force and the next balances the weight. since the car is in equilibrium the remaining component must balance the weight of the car. so

R cos θ=mg

but my point if R is smaller than mg itself how can this value be equal in magnitude.

i am not clear how you said R > mg can you please mathematically demonstrate it

i could not get the point how road give so much force on the car greater than the car gives on the road ( max force car can give on the road is equal to mg, isn't it? ) . can you explain it further more?

R cos θ=mg

but my point if R is smaller than mg itself how can this value be equal in magnitude.

i am not clear how you said R > mg can you please mathematically demonstrate it

i could not get the point how road give so much force on the car greater than the car gives on the road ( max force car can give on the road is equal to mg, isn't it? ) . can you explain it further more?

Last edited:

- #8

Doc Al

Mentor

- 45,586

- 2,305

It's a 'reaction' force in the sense that the force that the road exerts on the car must be equal and opposite to the force that the car exerts on the road.regan1 said:Is not R the reaction force and how can Reaction force be greater than the weight of the car ?

That force would equal the weight of the car if the car were in equilibrium. But it's not. Acceleration changes things.

Imagine yourself on an elevator. When the elevator is stationary (or moving with constant speed) the 'reaction' force of the floor on you will equal your weight. But if the elevator accelerates upward, that force will be greater than your weight.

The same thing is going on here, but it's a bit obscured by the fact that the motion is circular.

- #9

jbriggs444

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 12,821

- 7,478

regan1 said:max force car can give on the road is equal to mg, isn't it?

No. It's not.

- #10

regan1

- 5

- 0

jbriggs444 said:No. It's not.

if not, doesn't it violate Newton's third law of motion. to be the upward pulling force of the road greater there must be other external force.

- #11

Doc Al

Mentor

- 45,586

- 2,305

Sounds like you are thinking that the force of the road on the car is the reaction force to the car's weight. That's not true. The car's weight is the gravitational force exerted by the Earth on the car; the 'reaction' force to that is the gravitational force exerted by the car on the earth.regan1 said:if not, doesn't it violate Newton's third law of motion. to be the upward pulling force of the road greater there must be other external force.

The correct Newton's 3rd law pair to the force of the road on the car is the equal and opposite force that the car exerts on the road. That force depends on various things, not just the weight of the car.

Circular motion on a banked curve refers to the movement of an object along a curved path while maintaining a constant speed. The curve is banked or tilted at an angle to provide the necessary centripetal force to keep the object moving in a circular path.

Centripetal force is the force that acts towards the center of the circular path, keeping the object moving along the curve. In circular motion on a banked curve, the angle of the banked curve is adjusted to provide the necessary centripetal force, preventing the object from slipping or skidding off the curve.

The angle of bank is directly proportional to the speed of the object. As the speed increases, the angle of bank must also increase to provide enough centripetal force to keep the object in circular motion. If the speed decreases, the angle of bank must also decrease to prevent excess centripetal force that could cause the object to slip off the curve.

The frictional force is affected by the angle of bank, the speed of the object, and the coefficient of friction between the object and the surface of the curve. A steeper angle of bank and higher speeds require a larger frictional force to prevent slipping, while a higher coefficient of friction can reduce the necessary frictional force.

Uniform circular motion refers to the movement of an object along a circular path at a constant speed, while circular motion on a banked curve involves an object moving along a curved path with varying speeds. In uniform circular motion, the centripetal force is provided solely by the force of gravity, while in circular motion on a banked curve, the angle of bank is adjusted to provide the necessary centripetal force.

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 2K

- Replies
- 5

- Views
- 1K

- Replies
- 13

- Views
- 5K

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 1K

- Replies
- 8

- Views
- 2K

- Replies
- 18

- Views
- 2K

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 738

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 2K

- Replies
- 9

- Views
- 2K

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 4K

Share: