Hello Guest it is September 21, 2019, 05:59:32 AM

Author Topic: Anyone tried the new plugin yet ?  (Read 15030 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

ynneb

*
Re: Anyone tried the new plugin yet ?
« Reply #10 on: May 07, 2007, 07:46:42 AM »
Kookaburra (Dave) made a special request for this section to be set up.
I told him I would only if he vowed to run it.
I will give him grief, and see where he is at.
Re: Anyone tried the new plugin yet ?
« Reply #11 on: May 18, 2007, 07:52:42 PM »
"2,022" new versions were found.
I am a secret whether it worked enough. ???
Re: Anyone tried the new plugin yet ?
« Reply #12 on: May 18, 2007, 08:02:41 PM »
It has been tested and works better then any other release.  I have a few guys that I set up with Pods and they are reporting that it is working very well :)
Sorry I have not had time to post about it as I have been working on other projects
Fixing problems one post at a time ;)

www.newfangledsolutions.com
www.machsupport.com
Re: Anyone tried the new plugin yet ?
« Reply #13 on: May 19, 2007, 08:51:15 PM »
I cannot do reading of "firm ware".
I continue testing it for another one year.
I cannot confirm it then which part I become an error in.
Are not there a test driver and a laboratory method of a loader?

« Last Edit: May 19, 2007, 09:00:41 PM by apollonono »
Re: Anyone tried the new plugin yet ?
« Reply #14 on: May 19, 2007, 11:08:22 PM »
It looks to me that you have the software installed ... Hmmm could you please try to install the software from www.oemtech.com and see if it will work. That is as basic as we can get for testing at this point.

Thanks
Brian
Fixing problems one post at a time ;)

www.newfangledsolutions.com
www.machsupport.com
Re: Anyone tried the new plugin yet ?
« Reply #15 on: May 20, 2007, 08:03:04 AM »
The version is 2022 to be seen with an image.
Naturally they are things loaded download by "www.oemtech.com".
A certain person says that a certain person who should have been able to update it becomes an error.
Will there be an impossible thing by an original board version?
"USB2.0" says that, therefore, results are different, but will there be a mistake for its confirmation?
When I write scenery of a basic difference as well as it.
Windows is slightly different from a Japanese edition with English version.
Only a Japanese edition is available even if I access ".NET" and "IE7" of English version in Japan.
Because only English version is available in natural U.S.A., I cannot inspect it even if different in movement of "ncPOD".
I imagine this in what there is about a different language version except English a little.
I am about "USB2.0" next, but there are a similar problem and problems such as "vendor ID", and its handling becomes indistinct.
It is "a boot loader" and those adaptability that I have a hard time most.
At first let me examine this part.
« Last Edit: May 20, 2007, 08:25:59 PM by apollonono »
Re: Anyone tried the new plugin yet ?
« Reply #16 on: May 28, 2007, 08:55:13 PM »
"2024 versions" came this time.
Unfortunately this was not usable to me, too.
Please light up course ahead.
2024 indication

It should solve a problem of a boot loader earlier.
It is early and discovers a problem to come out next and is easy to come to solve it if I do so it.
« Last Edit: May 28, 2007, 09:22:34 PM by apollonono »
Re: Anyone tried the new plugin yet ?
« Reply #17 on: July 19, 2007, 11:57:01 PM »
As for me, a dyne loaded "(Firmware Version 2027)ncPODUpdater.exe" and installed it.
The movement of the program recognizes a port and a board, and I update an item, and it is it with an all error 3 automatically.
And it is displayed with update success, but actually nothing changes.
I try the different "ncPOD" panel program of the version, but, for three boards, do the indication which is in different states.
I arrive for the board which I own during about 2 years, and it is exasperating, and still basic improvement thinks what is not done to be it.