Hello
Guest
it is
October 31, 2024, 08:05:13 PM
Guest
Login
Register
Menu
Home
Help
Search
Login
Register
YouTube
Machsupport Forum
/
G-Code, CAD, and CAM
/
G-Code, CAD, and CAM discussions
/
Strange tool offset problem
« previous
next »
Print
Pages:
1
2
»
Go Down
Author
Topic: Strange tool offset problem (Read 14928 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
tesart
28
Strange tool offset problem
«
on:
August 19, 2009, 09:37:03 AM »
I am running MastercamX and am using the post found on this site for Mach3. I have all my tools in quick change collets and have them all ref. But whan I run a program it ignores the tool length offset. From reading here and the manual it seems that the post processor isn't putting in the H~ call out for the tool # after the G44. Can some one please help.
OR I am missing something....
I am running the latest lockdown
Thanks
Tom
«
Last Edit: August 20, 2009, 03:10:53 PM by tesart
»
Logged
tesart
28
Re: Need a post edited... I think
«
Reply #1 on:
August 19, 2009, 11:02:51 AM »
OK thats not it, I think I am missing something simple. here is my work-around, start the program>Asks for tool>then I go to offsets, Tool Offset led is on but the DRO is wrong, I turn it off and it changes the DRO, I turn it back on and it is correct, I go back to the program screen and hit cycle start and every thing is fine.
any Ideas
Thanks
Tom
Logged
vmax549
Re: Need a post edited... I think
«
Reply #2 on:
August 19, 2009, 04:32:37 PM »
You are correct you gcode does not have the G43 H# in it . It has been forever since I played in a MC post but I think this is the secton you need to look at:
# Toolchange / NC output Variable Formats
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------
fmt T 4 t$ #Tool No
fmt T 4 first_tool$ #First Tool Used
fmt T 4 next_tool$ #Next Tool Used
fmt D 4 tloffno$ #Diameter Offset No >>>>>> Change to Tloffyes$
fmt H 4 tlngno$ #Length Offset No >>>>>> Change to Tlngyes$
fmt G 4 g_wcs #WCS G address
fmt P 4 p_wcs #WCS P address
fmt S 4 speed #Spindle Speed
fmt M 4 gear #Gear range
# ---------------------------------------------------
Just a thought, (;-) TP
Logged
tesart
28
Re: Need a post edited... I think
«
Reply #3 on:
August 20, 2009, 03:09:06 PM »
Thanks, I tried your suggestion but it still does the same thing. It seems that for some reason Mach isn't automatically recognizing the Z/tool offset.
Tom
Logged
vmax549
Re: Strange tool offset problem
«
Reply #4 on:
August 20, 2009, 10:47:28 PM »
From the copde you posted there is NO code to call the tool offsets into play.
(;-) TP
Logged
tesart
28
Re: Strange tool offset problem
«
Reply #5 on:
August 21, 2009, 08:28:21 AM »
Shouldn't the G44 do it?...
Tom
Logged
ger21
6,295
Re: Strange tool offset problem
«
Reply #6 on:
August 21, 2009, 01:41:17 PM »
The manual says to use G44 if G43 gives negative offsets, so they apparently are not the same. Also, the manual is a few years old, so hard to say if it's still correct. But I think you should be using G43.
Logged
Gerry
2010 Screenset
http://www.thecncwoodworker.com/2010.html
JointCAM Dovetail and Box Joint software
http://www.g-forcecnc.com/jointcam.html
tesart
28
Re: Strange tool offset problem
«
Reply #7 on:
August 21, 2009, 02:08:24 PM »
I've tried it both ways with the same results.
Tom
Logged
vmax549
Re: Strange tool offset problem
«
Reply #8 on:
August 21, 2009, 02:28:42 PM »
I don't think you understand the TLO gcode convention. You can't just call the G43/44 as a modal call in the preamble.
THe code would look like this after each tool change
M6t1 >>>>>>>> this calls the tool#
m3 s1000 f10
G43 H1>>>>>>>>>>>>> this calls the tool length offset
Z0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this is a prep move to allow Mach room to apply the comp
*****
*****
Just a thought, (;-) TP
Logged
tesart
28
Re: Strange tool offset problem
«
Reply #9 on:
August 21, 2009, 02:59:29 PM »
Your right on there
A year ago I didn't know how to run a CNC and now(thanks to this forum and a bit of insanity) I have rebuilt one. I'm just trying to work out the last few kinks. Thanks for the info, now I can play with the post and see if I can make output something similar.
Thanks agian,
Tom
Logged
Print
Pages:
1
2
»
Go Up
« previous
next »