Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 27, 2012, 10:31:54 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
* Home Help Search Calendar Links Login Register
+  Machsupport Forum
|-+  Mach Discussion
| |-+  General Mach Discussion
| | |-+  Mach3 problem with new cnc
Pages: « 1 2 3   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Mach3 problem with new cnc  (Read 1225 times)
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
jimmyaz
Active Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 11


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: June 04, 2011, 03:16:20 PM »

Tweakie, running the machine slower than it can is avoiding the problem.. not solving it... Smiley


As for the driver test... I don't quite understand how to ready the result?  What's consider good and what's consider bad, what are you suppose to look for in the test?

Logged
Chestermarine
Active Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 38


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: June 04, 2011, 03:54:12 PM »

Quote
Anyone else have any views on the future for Mach (except that version 4 will solve everything) ??

Tweakie.

Mach will just get better as time goes on. Any software as complicated and multi-faceted as Mach, takes a long time to sort out. As I understand, Brian is a re-organizing the entire program into a better structured format, with fewer inherent problems. I am sure he has a few new goodies as well! Roll Eyes

 However, v.4  will not resolve hardware problems.

The parallel port is really old technology in this fast changing world of computers. Ethernet is the new fast communication link, and is on every new computer today, and should be a consideration when building a new system.

Logged
ger21
Global Moderator
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2,619



View Profile WWW
« Reply #22 on: June 04, 2011, 05:48:37 PM »

Quote
As for the driver test... I don't quite understand how to ready the result?  What's consider good and what's consider bad, what are you suppose to look for in the test?

A flat line with no spikes is preferable.
Logged

jrobson
Active Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 78


View Profile
« Reply #23 on: June 06, 2011, 03:31:36 AM »

Hi

Give this a shot...
http://www.keyshot.com/

Download the trial of keyshot, install it and run it while you do the drivertest / mach, see if it solves the problem. You don't actually have to do anything in keyshot, as long as it is running.

If I have Keyshot running the drivertest flatlines at 100Khz, when I close it it is all over the place... maybe it works for you? It would be interesting if it does, it would point to a software solution.
Logged
jrobson
Active Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 78


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: June 06, 2011, 04:12:31 AM »

EDIT: Post removed.

Try keyshot even on a single cpu/core system.
« Last Edit: June 06, 2011, 04:24:18 AM by jrobson » Logged
jimmyaz
Active Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 11


View Profile
« Reply #25 on: June 06, 2011, 09:17:46 AM »

I gave up!

I fixed my other PC, full size tower.  2.4ghz, 1.3gb ram, 128mb graphic... and it work great.  I was able to run 35,000hz or even higher.... Was able to run maximum speed without losing position. 

I am now positive it's the power supply, as adding more hardware made the problem worse.

Smiley


Logged
handsmfg
Active Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 30


View Profile
« Reply #26 on: June 06, 2011, 05:20:44 PM »

Hi jimmyaz

Glad you got back up and running again. Some computers are just junk for running Mach 3. I thought about a new computer to run Mach 3. Then saw the prices and still there was no guarantee that Mach 3 would work. That's why I went with old technology and a proven brand of computer used by many Mach 3 users. Happy chips.

Eric
Logged
jimmyaz
Active Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 11


View Profile
« Reply #27 on: June 06, 2011, 09:26:02 PM »

Well, with the working comp... I was able to do this.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ndHjIDd15Gg

I am hoping the new Spindle would fix the noise issue of the router, as you can hear in the video... Smiley


* IMG_6854.JPG (159.91 KB, 800x581 - viewed 37 times.)

* IMG_6855.JPG (136.23 KB, 800x533 - viewed 40 times.)

* IMG_6857.JPG (154.61 KB, 800x533 - viewed 32 times.)
« Last Edit: June 06, 2011, 09:28:12 PM by jimmyaz » Logged
Pages: « 1 2 3   Go Up
Print
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!