Hi,
however if you tell me that it is compatible with Mach4, it must be perfectly! because the money we paid was valid.
That is rather the point, they claim to have a working Mach4 solution, and it must be said its not bad but it is far from
perfect. I doubt in fact if there is ANY controller that could be deemed perfect however there are a number that do a
better job the CSMIO. This is a great pity because CSLabs had a very VERY good reputation for quality, functionality
and support. The quality remains but the functionality lags behind others and support sucks. They also demand quite
a premium for their product....could you be satisfied?.
now I want to understand who is responsible for the G76 and G84.
the plugin or Mach4?
I cannot answer that, as in a lot of realtime ops, drill cycles included, it is a co-operative venture between the motion controller
and Mach4. It may be that there is fault on both sides. The fact that RT concludes as you do but with a different motion controller
suggests that Mach4 is at fault.
Perhaps someone from NFS would like to explain, at least in general terms, whats going on.
Craig