Hello Guest it is October 24, 2019, 01:26:54 AM

Author Topic: mach 3 driver test program  (Read 6874 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Hood

*
  •  25,856 25,856
  • Carnoustie, Scotland
    • View Profile
Re: mach 3 driver test program
« Reply #10 on: August 19, 2011, 08:25:39 AM »
So your problem is you can not set puse width to 2 or 4?
I tried with your xml and its fine, in fact it was actually set to 2 fr pulse width a Dir was zero.
Hood
Re: mach 3 driver test program
« Reply #11 on: August 19, 2011, 08:33:22 AM »
but why does it not shows me 2  only  shows me 1

Offline Hood

*
  •  25,856 25,856
  • Carnoustie, Scotland
    • View Profile
Re: mach 3 driver test program
« Reply #12 on: August 19, 2011, 08:36:38 AM »
please attach a screenshot of what you see as I  see as below with your xml

Hoo
Re: mach 3 driver test program
« Reply #13 on: August 19, 2011, 08:54:20 AM »
i  have  only thet

Offline RICH

*
  • *
  •  7,368 7,368
    • View Profile
Re: mach 3 driver test program
« Reply #14 on: August 19, 2011, 06:45:12 PM »
You xml works for me....maybe its the screen your using.
Try it with the standard 1024 mill screen.
RICH
Re: mach 3 driver test program
« Reply #15 on: August 20, 2011, 09:07:17 PM »
in other  computer is  other screen  and is the same

Offline Hood

*
  •  25,856 25,856
  • Carnoustie, Scotland
    • View Profile
Re: mach 3 driver test program
« Reply #16 on: August 20, 2011, 09:08:33 PM »
Well I dont know how it can be unless its a different xml you are using than you posted?
Hood
Re: mach 3 driver test program
« Reply #17 on: August 20, 2011, 09:10:22 PM »
no  only  that

Offline Hood

*
  •  25,856 25,856
  • Carnoustie, Scotland
    • View Profile
Re: mach 3 driver test program
« Reply #18 on: August 20, 2011, 09:11:35 PM »
well afraid I dont have an answer for you as it works fine for me and also Rich.
Hood

Offline Hood

*
  •  25,856 25,856
  • Carnoustie, Scotland
    • View Profile
Re: mach 3 driver test program
« Reply #19 on: August 20, 2011, 09:13:04 PM »
What version of Mach are you using? May be that there was a problem with that at some point, dont recall ever hearing about such and issue though so only a wild guess.
Hood