Hello Guest it is May 24, 2019, 09:44:31 AM

Author Topic: Driver test failed: APIC seems to fail  (Read 7920 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline DB

*
  •  3 3
    • View Profile
Driver test failed: APIC seems to fail
« on: May 18, 2011, 05:47:10 AM »
I've installed Mach3 on my P4 XP system. I did a clean install, removed all junk (but did install all drivers off course), disabled power management in any way I could (including in the BIOS), so I thought: Mach3 should run flawlessly now. but it doesn't. When I run the drivertest, at first glance it seems to be working perfect, a clean line, 24700 pulses/second or so, but after 1 or 2 seconds the pulses/sec goes down to 96 and it doesn't go up again. when I choose a different kernel speed it goed back up, stays there for 1 or 2 seconds, and goes down again.
what I've tried so far:
- install the special driver (no difference)
- installed an older version of mach (no difference)
- tested every LPT port setting available in BIOS (no effect)

if I recall correctily, the best port setting for mach3 is EPP with interrupt.
one thing I did notice however is that in the drivertest,  the APIC timing constant is always 0, and so is the box 'interrupt used'. it seems to me that that isn't good.

does anyone have any idea how to get this working?

andrewm

*
Re: Driver test failed: APIC seems to fail
« Reply #1 on: May 18, 2011, 09:00:51 AM »
Have you tried the XP Optimization file?

http://www.machsupport.com/downloads/XP_Optimization.txt

Offline DB

*
  •  3 3
    • View Profile
Re: Driver test failed: APIC seems to fail
« Reply #2 on: May 18, 2011, 12:49:04 PM »
yes, I have. actually, I did even more than that, since I also disabled power management in BIOS. but I don't think optimization is the problem, these optimizations are for keeping as much procesor time as possible free for Mach3, so this timing line is as stable as possible. during the first 2 seconds this line is very stable, but then my pulses/sec goes down.
so far, the two things I've noticed which I think aren't normal: when I start the drivertest, the line seems perfect, 24500 pulses/sec, but the score bar says pulsing too fast. second: apic timing constant is 0.

Offline DB

*
  •  3 3
    • View Profile
Re: Driver test failed: APIC seems to fail
« Reply #3 on: May 18, 2011, 03:42:59 PM »
It's working! the problem was indeed with the interrupt: the parallel port was set to use interrupt 7. it was set this way in the bios, and in the device manager the parallel port was set to use an interrupt. but, windows still didn't get it: on the resources page in device manager, there wasn't any interrupt mapped to the parallel port. so, I mapped IRQ7, et voila, the steppers are stepping!

the system is very stable now, the line almost completely flat. even 100KHz is no problem. one funny thing: APIC timing constant is still 0.
Re: Driver test failed: APIC seems to fail
« Reply #4 on: August 19, 2014, 01:10:29 AM »
Hello

I'm having a similar problem.

I'm running Mach on 1GHz 512SD RAM Dell Inspirion 4100 machine. The driver test in first two seconds shows normal pulse and then goes of the chart with 8700 pulses/s. When running the stepper motors they are running slow and with lot of interferations.

In BIOS the LPT1 is set to ECP Extended Capability Port, in device manager I've set it to IRQ7. No change.

Does the comp have too little RAM? hmmmm I'm beating my head off this one.

tx

Online ger21

*
  • *
  •  6,233 6,233
    • View Profile
    • The CNC Woodworker
Re: Driver test failed: APIC seems to fail
« Reply #5 on: August 19, 2014, 07:21:03 AM »
Make sure that in the bios, the PC is set to Stanard, and not ACPI.
I use a 1Ghz Dell PIII with 256MB of ram, and it runs fine, but not if setup as ACPI.
I have heard that there are some Dells that will not run Mach3, no matter what you do, but I don't know which ones those are.
Gerry

2010 Screenset
http://www.thecncwoodworker.com/2010.html

JointCAM Dovetail and Box Joint software
http://www.g-forcecnc.com/jointcam.html
Re: Driver test failed: APIC seems to fail
« Reply #6 on: August 19, 2014, 10:03:28 AM »
Thank you so so so soooooo much. It works flawles.