121
Video P*r*o*b*i*n*g / Re: setting up cammera and laser
« on: February 20, 2008, 01:13:56 AM »
Hello Mark,
> So if I understand correctly the ideal is to have a F-theta type optic in front of the CCd
> to bring the laser plane in focus over the entire CCD while still having the camera axis a
> something less than the ideal 90 degrees included angle
No. The lens is a typical imaging lens...an fTan(theta) lens if you want to put a math label on it. An fTheta lens is used to produce a constant velocity line scan from a rotating mirror. An fTheta lens will produce distortion if used for imaging.
I will say that a small angular field of view is preferred as that is simply a longer focal length and otherwise nothing special. A short focal length lens produces a wide angular field of view but usually also produces significant barrel distortion unless you buy an expensive wide angle lens. Try to keep the full angular field of view under 20 degrees where the tangent of the angle is nearly equal to the angle in radians. Focal lengths in the 10mm to 25mm range are much better than 3mm to 10mm range for low distortion.
> Now I guess the challenge is to ... use sofware to find the center of a fuzzy beam
> image (less than ideal and sacrifice accuracy and resolution).
Bad plan. That is like saying that you will not use an antenna because you can digitally salvage a radio signal. There is only so much you can do with software to salvage a poor signal buried in noise.
> Anybody got access to ray tracing software?
I do.
> Might make finding the right layout and optics choice easier.
I have done this many times. However, I need the lens prescription to do a proper trace. That info is not included with a $30 webcam. I have reverse engineered one camera but cannot possibly reverse engineer the variety of cameras being used by this group.
When I did this for hire I started with customer requirements then chose the camera and its lens and the laser and its lens from optical engineering catalogs and designed everything else. Costwise these components put the project out of the amateur's reach.
But to see for yourself how bad it is when the ccd plane IS parallel to the lens while the laser plane IS NOT parallel to the lens you need only do a paraxial ray trace on graph paper or with line drawing software. If I can figure out how to post embedded drawings I will post some and describe the problem details.
Tom Hubin
thubin@earthlink.net
> So if I understand correctly the ideal is to have a F-theta type optic in front of the CCd
> to bring the laser plane in focus over the entire CCD while still having the camera axis a
> something less than the ideal 90 degrees included angle
No. The lens is a typical imaging lens...an fTan(theta) lens if you want to put a math label on it. An fTheta lens is used to produce a constant velocity line scan from a rotating mirror. An fTheta lens will produce distortion if used for imaging.
I will say that a small angular field of view is preferred as that is simply a longer focal length and otherwise nothing special. A short focal length lens produces a wide angular field of view but usually also produces significant barrel distortion unless you buy an expensive wide angle lens. Try to keep the full angular field of view under 20 degrees where the tangent of the angle is nearly equal to the angle in radians. Focal lengths in the 10mm to 25mm range are much better than 3mm to 10mm range for low distortion.
> Now I guess the challenge is to ... use sofware to find the center of a fuzzy beam
> image (less than ideal and sacrifice accuracy and resolution).
Bad plan. That is like saying that you will not use an antenna because you can digitally salvage a radio signal. There is only so much you can do with software to salvage a poor signal buried in noise.
> Anybody got access to ray tracing software?
I do.
> Might make finding the right layout and optics choice easier.
I have done this many times. However, I need the lens prescription to do a proper trace. That info is not included with a $30 webcam. I have reverse engineered one camera but cannot possibly reverse engineer the variety of cameras being used by this group.
When I did this for hire I started with customer requirements then chose the camera and its lens and the laser and its lens from optical engineering catalogs and designed everything else. Costwise these components put the project out of the amateur's reach.
But to see for yourself how bad it is when the ccd plane IS parallel to the lens while the laser plane IS NOT parallel to the lens you need only do a paraxial ray trace on graph paper or with line drawing software. If I can figure out how to post embedded drawings I will post some and describe the problem details.
Tom Hubin
thubin@earthlink.net