11
Mach4 General Discussion / Re: Step pulse duty cycle
« on: April 20, 2019, 05:15:18 AM »
Craig,
Thanks very much for that comprehensive answer.
I've seen videos of closed loop working far faster than what I am achieving, and set to a 1000 steps, I don't think any on the ESS though. I'm only looking for about 3000mm/min, at the moment I'm getting to about 1800. The drivers default, and lowest division is 400, so I've set it to that and got to 4000mm/min, I was hoping to keep to the 10um accuracy, so it's not that far off.
My current open loop drives are set to a 1000 and I'm getting a stall free 1800 out of those.
The closed loop is certainly smoother sounding and feeling and much cooler.
I think the problem is the signal to the driver, I think the driver is just not getting the faster signal from the ESS. I'm going to experiment a bit and generate my own signal to see if it performs as the vendor describes with a 1:1 square wave, then look at my options.
Many thanks
Carl.
Thanks very much for that comprehensive answer.
I've seen videos of closed loop working far faster than what I am achieving, and set to a 1000 steps, I don't think any on the ESS though. I'm only looking for about 3000mm/min, at the moment I'm getting to about 1800. The drivers default, and lowest division is 400, so I've set it to that and got to 4000mm/min, I was hoping to keep to the 10um accuracy, so it's not that far off.
My current open loop drives are set to a 1000 and I'm getting a stall free 1800 out of those.
The closed loop is certainly smoother sounding and feeling and much cooler.
I think the problem is the signal to the driver, I think the driver is just not getting the faster signal from the ESS. I'm going to experiment a bit and generate my own signal to see if it performs as the vendor describes with a 1:1 square wave, then look at my options.
Many thanks
Carl.