520
« on: June 15, 2008, 02:38:09 AM »
I will only say this once again, then I shall have to withdraw from this post.
If your calculated number of steps per inch is 20,000 - and that calculation is correct, then, despite what you say, measure or otherwise arrive at, that is the number of pulses that will give you the correct one inch of travel. Your figure of 20,000 would seem to be correct. Mine is 60,000 but I have 3 to 1 gearing on my leadscrews. It would seem you have Gecko drives (or similar) with 10 microsteps, you have 1.8 degree motors, and a 1/10 inch pitch leadscrew. Now - the only one of those that can change is the leadscrew, and I have never heard a lathe manufacturer who produces a leadscrew of 0.1048 pitch. Even if the leadscrew was a 25mm metric masquarading as an imperial screw, the pitch would be 0.1016.
You have arrived at your 20,967 by some sort of measuring - and it is incorrect. It may be you have run the table left, set everyting to zero, then run the table to the right for one inch measured by one of your measures and gradually increased the number of steps till you got an accurate reading. The problem there is backlash - and you appear to have about 50 thou (same as me).
If you are taking measurements, you must always move the table in the same direction. Enter 20,000 as your steps per inch. Move the table 1/2inch right to get rid of backlash, then set up your DTI and zero it. Now move the table to the right again. If you use a G1 command, you can specify the feedrate f say at 4 to keep speeds low so you dont miss steps, and when Mach tells you it has moved 1 inch check your DTI It should be correct to within 1 thou - maybe 2. Move the table another inch to the right - now two inches, and check with the DTI this should also be accurate to within a thou or 2, because errors do not accumulate.I used digital calipers to check mine, and could do up to 5 inches. I don't know what measuring equipment you have. I am a bit reluctant, but I suppose you could use your secondary scale.
If the error using such a method DOES NOT accumulate - i,e, you were 1 or 2 thou out every time over the length you checked, then your pulses per inch are correct.
If the error KEPT INCREASINGÂ each inch of travel, then your pulses per inch was incorrect - and I will stand corrected.
That is all I can say. I will read the post with interest to find out what the answer is.