Hello Guest it is April 24, 2024, 10:15:50 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Davek0974

1701
General Mach Discussion / Re: Bridgeport Knee Mill Conversion?
« on: May 17, 2016, 08:25:42 AM »
Nice, do you feel it was needed to have 24v supply for the CSMIO separate from the 24v controls or is it just "good practice"??

1702
General Mach Discussion / Re: Bridgeport Knee Mill Conversion?
« on: May 17, 2016, 07:40:20 AM »
The Soft Limits on the CSMIO's work great and are better than the ones via Mach with the PP or for that matter Mach/SmoothStepper (unless it has changed) and likely a lot of other  external controllers.

The CSMIO Know where the limits are and so will use the deceleration (acceleration) in motor tuning and will stop exactly on the soft limit using that decel. With Mach and the PP you need to set up a slow zone and you have to work that out by trial and error.

Personally I like Limit switches on my machines, I don't like to rely fully on software.
I do not have the limits going to Mach only as that again means you are relying on software.
I have my limits in an E-Stop chain which is totally hardware, ie it goes  via a pilz style safety relay, that relay will stop my servo drives, take away enables from the drives and in addition will also send a signal to Mach to E-Stop, so added safety.



I always have separate homes for each axis and shared limits for all axes, this allows me to have home switches inboard of the extents and can save a lot of moving if the axes are large.
 If you have these home switches stay triggered once reached then you can home from being already on a home switch with the CSMIO, It will see the switch is triggered and will do the back off move only.

Another good thing with  doing that (limits being hardware operated)  is it will always stop if you hit a limit even during Homing.
The way Mach works when homing is it ignores the limits, so if something goes wrong then hitting the limit will do nothing and you end up crashing the axis.

Hood

I'm getting to like this CSMIO controller more and more and i haven't even bought it yet :)

1703
General Mach Discussion / Re: Bridgeport Knee Mill Conversion?
« on: May 17, 2016, 07:37:41 AM »
Just looking at machine safety.

I think the weak point is the drive belt but still capable of transmitting damaging torque from a 750w servo at 2:1 and doing 3000rpm?

I guess I will find a spot for limits ;)

1704
General Mach Discussion / Re: Bridgeport Knee Mill Conversion?
« on: May 17, 2016, 06:35:37 AM »
Yes but what i am saying is - is it ok to rely on soft-limits alone to stop the machine self destructing?

Obviously it will be homed as a first step every start-up.

1705
General Mach Discussion / Re: Bridgeport Knee Mill Conversion?
« on: May 17, 2016, 06:24:01 AM »
But limits are machine protection not user.

1706
General Mach Discussion / Re: Bridgeport Knee Mill Conversion?
« on: May 17, 2016, 05:45:22 AM »
Thanks, will be using servo index homing so the switch quality is not important really.

I guess having a home switch and using soft-limits is just not safe on a big machine?

1707
General Mach Discussion / Re: Bridgeport Knee Mill Conversion?
« on: May 17, 2016, 05:19:27 AM »
Using the CSMIO/IP-A,

each button on the panel, limit, etc needs one input on the unit yes?

Trying to work out how many bells and whistles I can play with without adding expansion I/O

Can it use one input for all homes and limits or do limit --/++ need to be separate? The book shows one input each which is a bit of a waste;)


Stainless keyboard just arrived, it's a start I suppose ;)

1708
General Mach Discussion / Re: soldering iron info, please
« on: May 17, 2016, 01:24:06 AM »
Looks fine, make sure replacement tips are ok.

1709
General Mach Discussion / Re: soldering iron info, please
« on: May 16, 2016, 02:26:52 PM »
For the odd job, practically any iron around 25w will work.

If doing a bit more than the odd job the a temperature controlled type will be better.

1710
General Mach Discussion / Re: Physical buttons for plasma
« on: May 16, 2016, 10:23:54 AM »
Nice, I like simple :)