Hello Guest it is April 19, 2024, 06:01:39 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Davek0974

1641
Most likely looking at carbide two and four flute cutters, limited to <10mm dia.

Give us an idea of what sort of size tool and ill have a play with some figures.

1642
General Mach Discussion / Re: Bridgeport Knee Mill Conversion?
« on: May 27, 2016, 05:13:25 AM »
Lets re-visit this nugget while i'm planning wiring stuff...


I want/need two spindles here - the main mill quill and a bolt on high speed one - this will be clamped to the main mill quill for starters. Yes it will reduce the Z travel a bit but lets see how it plays before version 2. The aux spindle will only be doing thin stuff and engraving etc so smaller Z travel is probably not an issue.

Obviously when i clamp on the aux spindle it will stop the main Z home functioning so i need two Z homes, maybe two Z++ limits as well?

Ideas -
Two Mach profiles will work - The speed setup will be different for each motor, as will offsets probably and other stuff.
A switch for spindle 1 / spindle 2 - changes limits, motor control, vfd power, vfd control lines etc.?

Will only ever use one spindle or the other. I can definitely see two profiles being needed.

Looking for ways to switch all the lines needed -

Vfd supplies
vfd control and fault lines
vfd speed lines
limit switches for Z axis in two positions
homing for z axis in two positions

probably others....

The programming for the CSMIO plugin I hope will be specific to each profile?

This is a big part of the job - I need two spindles. Control is the issue i think - switching the system from one to the other. No problem doing a cold-start for the changeover - it's a boot-up decision.

Maybe choosing the Mach profile can control the spindle choice?

1643
General Mach Discussion / Re: Bridgeport Knee Mill Conversion?
« on: May 27, 2016, 05:06:50 AM »
Explain please, my terminology....

Controller - CSMIO
Drive - the servo amplifier units
Motor - the servo motor itself

1644
General Mach Discussion / Re: Bridgeport Knee Mill Conversion?
« on: May 27, 2016, 04:15:35 AM »
Sketching out my wiring diagram,

Safety:-

A - Use the CSMIO HV O/p to control power to the drives - this drops out when Mach goes into reset
B - Have a totally separate safety circuit with main reset button which drops out power to the drives - this circuit would control Machs' E-Stop system

A would have the drives killed every time Mach went into reset - limits etc
B would only kill the drives if an E-Stop button was pressed - a genuine E-Stop situation


1645
General Mach Discussion / Re: Bridgeport Knee Mill Conversion?
« on: May 27, 2016, 02:11:43 AM »
Ok, thanks, 6A B type should do it then.

1646
General Mach Discussion / Re: Bridgeport Knee Mill Conversion?
« on: May 26, 2016, 04:58:28 PM »
Can't see a max current listed, hence the question ;)


1647
General Mach Discussion / Re: Bridgeport Knee Mill Conversion?
« on: May 26, 2016, 02:31:58 PM »
Will have a play tomorrow, thanks

Couple of build q's...

What size fuse should i use for servo with a 750w motor ?

The PC - strip and build into the operator panel? strip and build into control cabinet? Leave as-is and stick it somewhere :)

Looks like the main cab will have to be cut and fabricated as it needs to be pretty big to fit all the bits in and big cabs cost ££££. Also sketching up ideas for the operator panel, probably suspended from the side of the main body somewhere so i still have the ability to use both ends of the ram if needed.

1648
General Mach Discussion / Re: Bridgeport Knee Mill Conversion?
« on: May 26, 2016, 02:10:50 PM »
Hi Hood,

I'm not too sure re the tuning - i mailed the seller who asked the supplier and the reply was that it was set by entering the motor code. There may be parameters but thats way beyond me.

yeah i think it will be fine, probably just didn't have enough coffee that day ;)

The wiring will only be a foot or so long and seems to work ok on the bench at 5' long so will give it a go - looks neater with moulded plugs too.

The error may also be because of running flat out with no load on the motor maybe?

1649
General Mach Discussion / Re: Bridgeport Knee Mill Conversion?
« on: May 26, 2016, 10:53:26 AM »
Ok, found it - it seems it does not like running right at the limit of max speed - if kept just below max it all works perfect.

If I set the max at 7500 and command a feed at 7500 it faults, if I set 7400 it works perfectly in all modes.

Wont get that high in real life as the mill bed is not really big enough.

1650
General Mach Discussion / Re: Bridgeport Knee Mill Conversion?
« on: May 26, 2016, 09:26:34 AM »
Ok, where did I slip up...

Previously had the motor tuning set as book, 2000 steps per (10,000 / 5mm pitch)

When I fit this on the machine it will be at 2:1 ratio so i set steps per to 4000 (10,000 * 2 / 5mm pitch) and set velocity to 7500 (3000rpm / 2 * 5mm pitch) acceleration is at 750mm/s/s

Works ok in jog mode, works ok in code mode at speeds up to 7500mm/min

If i do a "Goto zero" it runs for a while then stops with ePid fault.

It also allows me to set feed higher than it can handle and then goes into ePid fault.

Is there a reason here?