Hello Guest it is April 23, 2024, 09:43:57 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Ron Ginger

591
A shellac or other sticky way to hold parts is fine for one off stuff, but if you really want to make these in large numbers make a holding fixture. Id buy my stock in a width just enough to make one part. Start it in a vise, with just  a bit more than one half sticking up out of the vise, Cut your part half way down.

Next make a soft vise jaw and cut into it the image of the part- some call this a 'nest'. You flip the half cut part into the nest, tighten the vise, and do the other half.

Id also program an arc in and out on the cut to minimize the cutter marks, and Id program the part over size by about .010. Then Id make one final pass around the part at exact size as a finish cut.

I agree with the Bridgeport size machine. You ought to be able to run much faster than on the Taig. If you really want to buy a ready to run machine also look at the Tormach.

592
Newfangled Solutions Mach3 Wizards / Re: ODD Comp Move
« on: May 31, 2009, 09:05:46 PM »
Can you post a sample code that does this? It sounds like some init condition, but you say a reset clears it.

593
Quote
Ron, I think your motors where just rated too high a voltage. I think if you had 2V motors, you would have gotten acceptable performance.

I bought the xylotex kit, with their motors, board and power supply. When I found them to slow I replace the board with geckos and raised the power supply voltage to about 48v. That worked well.

The simple fact is that voltage equates to speed with steppers, and the Xylotex board with its 24v useful limit is just slow. With the Gecko 251s available (they were not when I started the project) I see no reason to ever buy a Xylotex board.

594
I had a Compac PC-5 which I converted to Mach. I bought motors and a Xylotex board. With the Xylotex board the machine was slower than with its old steppers. I replaced the xylotex with  geckos and got acceptable performance.

I have since decided the machine was to small for my use and have sold it. Im looking aorund now for a bigger lathe for my next project

595
Newfangled Solutions Mach3 Wizards / Re: 2.83 ready
« on: April 29, 2009, 09:04:18 PM »
Not until. after Brian releases the new cutter comp. As soon as that is out, and stable, I will fix the wizards.

596
VB and the development of wizards / Re: VB defines/header file?
« on: April 28, 2009, 06:52:08 PM »
I do not know of one. There was a recent list of all the DROs posted, but its only a list with descriptive names, not useable variable names

597
General Mach Discussion / Re: Help with Mach3 config.
« on: April 27, 2009, 09:17:43 PM »
I suggest you also print, or buy a copy of the printed, Install Manual The complete sequence of setting up a machine is detailed very well.

See the downloads tab at teh top of this page.

598
Newfangled Solutions Mach3 Wizards / Re: COPYCAT - "KOOL"
« on: April 16, 2009, 09:49:37 PM »
Yes a probe can be used to pickup accurate points. That was added recently so be sure you sue the latest version which is on this forum, not the one in the mach install

599
Finished Screens / Re: Quick Threads Wizards
« on: April 10, 2009, 08:22:29 AM »
If you want it to appear as a turn  wizard then it goes into the c:\Mach3\TurnAddons\QuickThreads. It will then appear on the list of wizards shown by the menu item for wizards.

600
Can the camera plugin be modified so we can adjust the crosshairs to an adjustable center? As it is we must mke a mechanical adjustment to get eh camera exactly centered on the axis of the spindle. If the crosshair was adjustable we could do it in software and make a much more accurate adjustment.

thanks