Hello Guest it is November 29, 2021, 11:53:45 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - derek

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 »
General Mach Discussion / Re: Time to show off my ATC
« on: December 28, 2012, 08:00:19 PM »
The reason I ask is I have a bp clone with a nt30 and would love a tool changer but didn't think I had enough room for a gripper without modding the spindle.

Also how did you get your mill to 6000rpm. Did you use an inverter and turn up the hertz?

I have a 2 pole motor that's rated at 3450 so I overdrive it a bit. In hind sight I wish I had bought a 4 pole and drove it a 120 or more hz to get the rpm. The 2 pole motor made indexing tricky and it has no guts in low rpm situations.

If you don't have a drawbar hole in your spindle then your dead in the water. If you do then I would measure the bore of the area above the taper, Check it for run out, and then measure the distance from the base of the bore to the face of the spindle nose (not the dogs). If you give me those figures I can quickly tell you if there is room.
I'd like to know myself. My neighbor has that spindle but without the drawbar hole and there didn't seem to be enough room above it to hold much.

General Mach Discussion / Re: Time to show off my ATC
« on: December 28, 2012, 12:57:19 PM »
Looks looks a great thing.  Did you have to regrind the spindle to fit the bt30 gripper in?

no there was enough room after grinding the taper for the gripper to fit.

General Mach Discussion / Re: Time to show off my ATC
« on: December 27, 2012, 01:42:15 PM »
great atc, looks very similar to the denford system. One observation though, you will need to cover the gear drive on the carousel as it will hold swarf and jam up relatively easily, a geneva mechanism was introduced to get past this problem.

Covers??? we don't need no stinkin covers!!!
Actually they're next on the list. I have a vacuum forming machine so I'm going to knock out a set from ABS.

General Mach Discussion / Re: Time to show off my ATC
« on: December 27, 2012, 12:46:38 PM »
What are you using to move the knee?  I've had, at various times, up to four gas springs on mine, but never got above 75 IPM, using an 850 oz-in DC servo driving through a 48:1 reduction: 5-pitch leadscrew, plus original bevel gears, plus a 4.8:1 belt reduction.  I assume you have a ballscrew on the knee?

I'm using an old Pacific Scientific treadmill motor and a Rutex 2020 drive. If I run it at 120 rapids the motor gets a little warm so I keep it at 100 so I have a little overhead. I'm not in that much of a hurry. I've been running it like this for at least 6 or 7 years. you can tell by the pictures the mill get's a lot of use.  Other than replacing the springs every so often it's been fine. I plan on changing over to pneumatic cylinders and a reservoir tank at some point.

Kinda funny....  I considered an approach similar to yours, but ruled it out due to space issues!  :-)  It would've required extending the table enclosure at least a foot further to one side to make room.

It's absolutely what works for one won't work for another type of thing.

General Mach Discussion / Re: Time to show off my ATC
« on: December 27, 2012, 12:28:20 PM »
Very nice!  But I'm wondering why you don't use your quill?  I ran my knee mill for about 18 months using the knee as the Z axis, and, besides being painfully slow (50 IPM, compared to 250 on X/Y), I saw significant wear on the leadscrew and bevel gears, and it's not hugely accurate, due to lead error in the leadscrew.  I added a quill drive, which has been wonderful.  Now I use the knee to apply tool length compensation, so I always have full quill travel for every tool.

I have gas springs on the knee so I have no trouble hitting 120 ipm with the knee. For the work I do it's plenty accurate. 15" of travel comes in pretty handy doing pattern work.

Just finished my own 10-tool ATC:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=54s0aoAT37o
Oh I've been following your exploits! I actually thought about the swing arm arrangement but because of space issues it didn't go very far for me.

It's great fun watching it work for the first few days, isn't it?

You got that right! For me it's been more of a "holy crap it actually works!!!" kind of thing.

General Mach Discussion / Time to show off my ATC
« on: December 27, 2012, 11:48:04 AM »
Well like so many people after seeing  Dave DeCaussin's ATC on you tube I had my “I want that!” moment.
The thing that put it over the top for me was being able to regrind the r8 to work with the BT30. I settled with using the 4 ball gripper design and Belleville washers for the drawbar pressure. My quill is locked and I use the knee for the Z axis so that made things a little easier. All of the drawbar parts are A2 that I hardened and tempered. The drawbar has about 1000 lbs of pressure. I’m using a 4” Bimba flat multi power cylinder. I needed the multi power as I don’t have a ton of travel on my Bellevilles. I’ve been using the drawbar setup since July and have had zero problems. I took it apart about 2 months ago and it looked perfect.
When I started working out my design for the ATC I was going to have the carousel on the end of the table and have the X axis bring it over to the spindle. I had a job come up where I really needed some sort of changer so I knocked together a quick tray type. One thing became immediately apparent was that I was running the crap out of the X axis. So out went that idea and I settled on a more traditional “fly it in” design. Over the course of time I settled on a 3 stage system. One stage down to line the forks up with the tool. one stage to engage horizontally and one stage to bring the tool down out of the spindle. There are proximity sensors at the end of each travel. The M6 macro is written so that it operates in a follow the leader fashion. When the first stage proximity activates it triggers the next stage. This works really great and is very safe.   I opted to use slides from cncrouterparts. They are inexpensive, well built and really versatile. They are designed to work with 80/20 extrusion and 1/4” CRS flat bar. I’ve used them in a couple of other projects and I was really happy. The carousel is driven by an extra servo motor I had and is designated as a C drive.  Spindle indexing was supposed to accomplished with the new Delta VFD-M I purchased but unfortunately it didn’t play nice with my 2 pole motor. I ended up going with a shot pin arrangement until I can afford a new motor.
Terry (BR549) wrote really slick macro for me that makes it all work. He has the spindle stop then turn slowly to the index signal. It then kills the spindle and shoots the pin. Another neat thing he did was instead of having a fixed position for the tool change he uses the “tool change position” DROs on the setup screen. This allows me to position the tool change at the most efficient spot for each setup.
I’m a big proponent of working out designs in 3D before committing to actual construction. The first thing I did was model my mill as closely as I could. I included the table and a couple of Kurt vises. You can download 3D files of the vises directly from Kurt. This allowed me to run the table through it’s motions and get a better idea of what kind of envelope I had to work with.

Then I proceeded to model the rest of the components as I worked out all the motion and clearance issues. Although his kind of modeling takes time I find for me the end product is so much cleaner. Plus I build it a few times in the computer so when it’s time for actual construction I have a good idea of what I’m doing. Most of the purchased components offered 3D files so this made things a lot easier.

Even 3D files of the pokeys were available.

The build was fairly straight forward. Most items were made from .5” thick 6061. I have a small anodizing line so I anodized everything. The extra holes in he parts are for mounting things if necessary. When I prototype I put extra drilled and tapped holes all over the place so that if I have to add something it’s not a big deal.

I opted for a traditional fork design with tension spring to retain the tools. It took a few designs to get it to slide over the balance holes drilled in the tool holders.

I also engraved the tool slot numbers in the edge of the carousel. Not sure how well this will work when I get the cover on.

Using the 80/20 extrusions and cncrouterparts slides made designing things like brackets much easier to build. They have 3D models available for all their components.

I’ve done a few thousand tool changes in an actual machining environment and only had a few bumps and those were caught by the proximity system.The things I’m going to change are pretty minor. The main vertical movement is too short. The tools collide with my splash guard mounted on the table. I have plenty of height and the higher I can get the tools the less chance chip contamination there will be.  Coincidentally I didn’t model the splash shield in my original model and now I’m paying the price. I also have a bit of tidying up to do but I’ll do that after the vertical mod.
Having an ATC has opened up a whole new set of things I can bid on and has already paid for the price of the parts in the few jobs I’ve done with it. Plus it was a gas to build and that in itself made it worth it.
Here's a couple of videos. The first one is a normal change with a 6000 rpm spindle speed and spindle indexing. The second one is an earlier macro before the indexing was hooked up but it shows the speed of the change.
Thanks for looking

General Mach Discussion / Re: And looking for a little more macro help
« on: November 29, 2012, 11:14:44 AM »
Worked like a champ!
Thanks Hood


General Mach Discussion / And looking for a little more macro help
« on: November 28, 2012, 05:55:37 PM »
Well I'm working out the final details (I hope) on my ATC.
I'm having a little trouble figuring out how something should be phrased.
Here is what I'm using

 Do While Not IsActive(Input1)
 sleep (10)         

But instead of it looking for input1 being active I need it to look for oemled 1005 being active.I've tried a few things but I can't seem to get a handle on it.


General Mach Discussion / Re: Improving resolution on C axis
« on: November 27, 2012, 07:16:27 PM »
And of course it was a tuning problem. And to think I ever doubted you guys :)
Runs smooth as silk and plenty fast.

Thanks again for the help

General Mach Discussion / Re: Improving resolution on C axis
« on: November 26, 2012, 06:34:54 PM »
Got it.

Thanks for the help. At least I know the steps per unit isn't the problem.


Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 »