Messages

191

General Mach Discussion / Re: New REV

« on: November 09, 2009, 10:45:22 AM »

Hood
My version reads R3.043.000 is there a later version ?

Dennis

192

LazyTurn / Re: LAZYTURN MANUAL

« on: October 20, 2009, 07:53:05 PM »

Hi Rich
 I am looking into a couple of cam package's and i do see some of the post processor's on the mach list but there is only one for a given cam package so i was wondering would that one processor work for both application's thanks for the reply.

Dennis 

193

LazyTurn / Re: LAZYTURN MANUAL

« on: October 20, 2009, 02:06:07 PM »

Hey Guy's question when using a cam program are the post processer's the same for mill and turn i read to use a fanuc but for both lahe and mill ?

Dennis

194

General Mach Discussion / Re: re: Whats happened to Mach.4 update

« on: October 14, 2009, 11:33:38 AM »

oh and thanks for the screen set.

Dennis

195

General Mach Discussion / Re: re: Whats happened to Mach.4 update

« on: October 14, 2009, 11:33:19 AM »

Hey Chip
On that file i talked to you about i think the problem may have been pointed out to me i will let you know if it works.

Dennis

196

General Mach Discussion / Re: re: Whats happened to Mach.4 update

« on: October 14, 2009, 11:00:53 AM »

Hi Brian
 Thanks for the information i hadn't seen any new release's heard about Mach 4 but that was all nothing in month's good to know what's going on from time to time I have 2 stand alone computers running my machine's one for a mill and one for a lathe i have had some success with cutting my parts while thinking i have it down then finding a cutting problem with another part that may be simpler in design but for an end user it's hard to know weather it's a code problem or cam interpreter problem thanks again for informing all of us whats going on i am looking forward to the new version.

Dennis   

197

General Mach Discussion / Re: re: Whats happened to Mach.4 update

« on: October 13, 2009, 06:50:55 PM »

PSG
 I have used a dongle on a Cadcam software same problem company goes under and the dongle no longer works or is supported in addition one company i used, you had to have a piece of software to run it with so a hard drive failure would take you down.No i think you should get your lic# pay the price if you agree to it and if your hard drive goes down you reinstall the software and off you go. But along with this you should get what you weer promised especially if you did not haggle with their asking price at the time.

Dennis

Hi, Dennis, Hears the screen set for mill, Chip.

198

General Mach Discussion / Re: re: Whats happened to Mach.4 update

« on: October 13, 2009, 11:00:28 AM »

PSG and Velly
 I to have several cadcam softwares on the shelf useless as the companies have gone under or been bought by another company and no longer support the product they would happly sell me the new product for many $ i pay the money i should get what i was promised a working bug free product that cuts what i want to cut not all this work around and filter it through this software and that one and in the end it still dose not cut what i need or want I hoped that Mach would be the answer i still hope so but like you guy's my confidence is shaken.

Dennis

199

General Mach Discussion / Re: re: Whats happened to Mach.4 update

« on: October 11, 2009, 03:58:15 PM »

Hi Ray
Thanks for the reply been about 8-9 months not heard anything further about it i work with mach on a daily basis mill and lathe and the work around's are a pain especially the offsetting bug along with some others hopefully Brian will get it going soon.

Dennis

200

General Mach Discussion / re: Whats happened to Mach.4 update

« on: October 11, 2009, 12:29:40 PM »

Hi Brian and Art
I have heard a lot about a mach 4 version with many of the bug's in Mach 3 fixed late last year around December a developer said he got a copy of it for beta testing recently he said there had been nothing further on it any info available is this as far as mach is going.

Rg's
Dennis