Hello Guest it is April 25, 2024, 06:37:23 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - titchener

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 »
71
General Mach Discussion / Re: Perfect circle--I wish
« on: July 10, 2008, 05:00:00 PM »
You need to fully eliminate the possibility of either ball screw backlash or mechanical slop first.

Set up a dial indicator in (or on) the spindle and indicate against a 1-2-3 block in your vice or a similar setup.

For the X axis, write a little g code program to approach the same position from 0.5" inch away from both sides, ie first approach from the left, then from the right.

Zero the indicator after the first approach, and step thru the program. Watch the difference in the indicator when approaching from either side.

This will approximate the ball screw backlash. Now this time do it again, but after it approaches from the left, push hard on the table from the right (the same direction the cutting tool will be pushing back against the table). As it approaches from the right, push hard on the table from the left.

Now the difference in the indicator reading will show the total amount of slop, including screw backlash, thrust bearing slop and any slop in your bearing yoke.

Do this same test also for the y axis. On a reasonably tight machine you should see less than 0.001" to 0.002" total slop on each axis.

If you have more than that you need to isolate where its coming from. Typically (and in order of most likely) its coming from worn or not properly preloaded thrust bearings, worn ball screws or a loose yoke.

To test the thrust bearings, put your dial indicator base on the end of the table and set up the dial indicator on the end of the ball screw. If the end is not flat, you can grab a small bearing ball, put a dab of grease on it and stick in in the center hole in the end of the screw an indicate on the ball.

Now step through the program above and watch the indictor at the direction reversals, and do the pressure on the table as described above. The total run out  you observe will be the thrust bearing slop. It should be less than 0.001". If its more either the bearings are worn or the preload is wrong.

Good luck-

Paul T.

72
General Mach Discussion / Re: printer port vs controller card ?
« on: July 10, 2008, 01:53:11 PM »
Bubba-

Having watched some hardware solutions that looked good on paper come and then go, I now take a pretty conservative approach.

At this point the broadest and most stable performance with Mach is still the PP solution. The SmoothStepper is looking pretty good, but there is still some functionality it doesn't support, so I'd call it in "Alpha" form at this point, close to being in "Beta" when it will have implemented all the functionality of the PP Mach version.

If you are building your machine now, I would definitely go with the PP solution. I use a SoundLogic breakout board with mine and it has worked well, but there are other breakout boards that also give good results.

The good news about the SmoothStepper is that is appears to be pretty easy to move to it from a PP machine, and if it gets to the point where it is really rock solid and is in wide use by the Mach user base, including the Mach developers, then I'll move to it also.

Paul T.

73
General Mach Discussion / Re: FREE 2D CAD (Solid edge)
« on: April 18, 2008, 01:43:46 PM »
"any hoops they need to jump through to get a drawing exported to generate code"

Exporting designs in .dfx format has worked fine for me going to both SheetCAM for 2.5D work and Rhino/RhinoCAM for 3D work.

Just do a "File Save As" and select the .dfx format. I would also suggest hitting the Advanced button and setting the specific format to the R12 version one, this version of the .dfx format gives you the best change of compatibility with other tools, it appears to remember this selection so you don't have to do it every time.

Keep in mind that the R12 version doesn't support splines (it converts polycurves to line segments) so if you need to export as splines you should use a later version.

Paul T.


74
General Mach Discussion / Re: FREE 2D CAD (Solid edge)
« on: April 17, 2008, 01:14:37 PM »
I like SolidEdge so far, I've been using it on a few small jobs over the last few weeks and I'll probably move over to it for good. Its a little sluggish to fire up, but I can live with that I guess.

Regarding the earlier post on positioning objects, here's how I do that. One thing about this package is its not quite as flexible as other package in allowing you to place the 0,0 origin of your drawing, but it can be done as discussed below.

I do my designs in the 2D model view as you are not constrained to working in a particular page size as you are in the other tabs. If you don't have the 2D model view as one of your page tabs there's a button you hit in one of the tool bars to generate it (can't remember exact name, has "model view" in it).

Then hit the Grid button. This will both turn grids on and show you the position of absolute zero in the model view at the intersection of the horiz. and vert. red lines.

You can now more easily move objects to place them where you want relative to 0,0 or each other.

Paul T.

75
Ron, any luck in fixing the "extra pass" problem described above? The Surfacing Wizard is a very fundamental one and its important that it functions correctly.

Thanks,

Paul T.

76
Hi Ron-

Ok, if I use a different tool number than the last one used in the wizard, I do now get both the tool change and the mist and coolant being turned on, but I'm still seeing a couple of problems.

If you turn on both mist and flood the wizard puts both commands on the same line, which causes an error in Mach.

If you try to use tool zero as the "new" tool number, the wizard never puts the tool change or the flood/mist commands in, even though tool zero is a legal tool number in Mach. I use it often when I'm going to be making any tool changes, one thing special about tool zero is it doesn't have an offset, so you don't have to worry about the offset being set correctly.

As far as trying to eliminate "extra" tool change and coolant calls in the generated wizard code, I think that's asking for trouble. Just because the tool specified the last time the wizards were used is the same as the one specified in a new wizard run doesn't mean that the tool is still in the machine, so if you don't specifiy the tool change you could cause a bad crash when the machine runs with a tool number that has a different offset than the tool that is actually in the machine.

This is something better handled on the Mach level anyway- I modified my tool change macros in Mach so that if it realizes that the tool being requested in a tool change is the same one thats in the machine already it doesn't stop for that tool change.

Paul T.

77
Regarding the approach amount, since I had selected Feed Stepover option I thinks its correct that you only see the approach implemented on the first engagement with the workpiece, after that everything is a feed stepover, correct?

78
Strange, if I turn on both the Flood and Mist I still don't get an M7 or an M8 in the code, I just did it again and  here's what pops out:

(Code by Newfangled Wizard, 5/22/2007)
(Program Posted for Aluminum )
G0 G49 G40.1 G17
G80 G50 G90 G98 
G20 (Inch)
(***** Material Surfacing *****)
M03 S1082.3
G00 Z0.1
G00 Z0.1
G00 X-1.7 Y3.25
G01 Z-0.01 F20
G01 X8
G01 Y1
G01 X0
G01 Y-1.25
G01 X8
G0 Z0.1
G0 X0Y4
M5 M9
M30

This is with Mach3 version 0.065 and its displays version 2.74 for the Conversational wizards. Its doing this same thing on 2 PC's, both my "design" PC and my "machine" PC. Its it possible that although its displaying version 2.74 that somehow an older version of the wizards is getting installed?

Thanks for looking into it-

Paul T.

79
Ron, as you probably remember I reported this bug quite a while ago and thought it had been fixed, but if it was fixed it creeped back in again. In the 2.74 version of the surfacing wizard, I have the Mist Coolant button selected on, but as the following generated code shows there is no M8 command to turn it on, only a M9 to turn it off at the end. Note that this "no coolant" problem had occurred in several of the other wizards also, so it would be a good idea to check to see if it got back in other ones also.

(Code by Newfangled Wizard, 5/20/2007)
(Program Posted for Aluminum )
G0 G49 G40.1 G17
G80 G50 G90 G98 
G20 (Inch)
(***** Material Surfacing *****)
M03 S1082.3
G00 Z0.1
G00 Z0.1
G00 X-1.7 Y3.25
G01 Z-0.01 F20
G01 X8
G01 Y1
G01 X0
G01 Y-1.25
G01 X8
G0 Z0.1
G0 X0Y4
M5 M9
M30

The toolpath that is generated to do the surfacing also has a problem. This workpiece is 4" wide, 8" long and the zero point is at the lower left hand corner and is selected for this in the wizard. The cutting tool is a 3" diameter face mill and the wizard is set for feed stepover. The first pass makes sense, its at a centerline of Y3.25" which gives the expected 75% overlap of the cutter with the top of the workpiece. The second pass then occurs at a centerline of Y1, which makes sense as the cutter is moved over for another 75% overlap with the uncut part of the workpiece. Since the cutter is 3" in diameter, this means the cutter overhangs the bottom of the workpiece by .25", so after the pass the surface cut is complete.

However for some reason, an additional cut is made with a centerline of Y-1.25, making a .25" overlap cut on the bottom of the workpiece which is unnecessary since this part has been cut already.

Thanks,

Paul Titchener

80
Newfangled Solutions Mach3 Wizards / Re: New Teach wizard
« on: March 02, 2007, 08:55:31 PM »
Ron, I like your new teach wizard so far.

You have a fair amount of screen space to work with so I'd lobby to add more functionality to it.
How about a "Drill Hole" button that lets you run a drilling cycle. I'd change the current "Holes" button to "Mill Hole".
Also it would be nice to have Mist and Coolant On/Off buttons.

Also the Feed settings didn't seem to be getting applied correctly when I was alternating between moves in X,Y and moves in Z.

Paul T.

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 »