Hello Guest it is April 26, 2024, 03:28:41 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - apollonono

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 »
31
NC Pod / Re: PWM to Digital??
« on: August 18, 2007, 11:50:39 AM »
PWM can set the A output of NCPOD. However, I do not understand whether I am correct because I have not yet tried it.

32
Because he tries it hard to finish a good work anytime, he does not give me off so pessimistically.
I may expect it in the next firm ware more. :o

33
General Mach Discussion / Re: Is it the movement speed of the system?
« on: July 21, 2007, 12:06:39 AM »
Because English is not a mother tongue, it is not correctly expressible.
After it ends when I operate "MACH3", "WIN2K" doesn't recover former speed.
It becomes energetic when rebooting.
Does "MACH3" rewrite program "Table of the task in WIN2K"?
For instance, the performance cannot be put out at all actually though "FT245RL" must be
enough as the update rate with transfer rate (D2XX) of about 1MB/a second.

34
NC Pod / Re: Anyone tried the new plugin yet ?
« on: July 19, 2007, 11:57:01 PM »
As for me, a dyne loaded "(Firmware Version 2027)ncPODUpdater.exe" and installed it.
The movement of the program recognizes a port and a board, and I update an item, and it is it with an all error 3 automatically.
And it is displayed with update success, but actually nothing changes.
I try the different "ncPOD" panel program of the version, but, for three boards, do the indication which is in different states.
I arrive for the board which I own during about 2 years, and it is exasperating, and still basic improvement thinks what is not done to be it.

35
General Mach Discussion / Is it the movement speed of the system?
« on: July 19, 2007, 10:13:47 PM »
I operate MACH3, and it sometimes happens that the drawing speed of the computer puts away very late when finished afterwards.
Can you easily return this normally?
What are these causes? ???

36
Mr. Carl says that movement of USB2.0 is necessary. However, I estimate that upload is not possible by a problem before it. ::)

"USB 2.0" is introduced into my "WIN2K" and will need it. How can I confirm it if I do it? ???

37
The machine which I am going to carry out is WIN2KSP4.
WIN includes English version and a Japanese edition, and it is a Japanese edition that I own.
Does a difference of a version become introduction disorder of firm ware? ???

38
NC Pod / Re: Anyone tried the new plugin yet ?
« on: May 28, 2007, 08:55:13 PM »
"2024 versions" came this time.
Unfortunately this was not usable to me, too.
Please light up course ahead.
2024 indication

It should solve a problem of a boot loader earlier.
It is early and discovers a problem to come out next and is easy to come to solve it if I do so it.

39
NC Pod / Re: Anyone tried the new plugin yet ?
« on: May 20, 2007, 08:03:04 AM »
The version is 2022 to be seen with an image.
Naturally they are things loaded download by "www.oemtech.com".
A certain person says that a certain person who should have been able to update it becomes an error.
Will there be an impossible thing by an original board version?
"USB2.0" says that, therefore, results are different, but will there be a mistake for its confirmation?
When I write scenery of a basic difference as well as it.
Windows is slightly different from a Japanese edition with English version.
Only a Japanese edition is available even if I access ".NET" and "IE7" of English version in Japan.
Because only English version is available in natural U.S.A., I cannot inspect it even if different in movement of "ncPOD".
I imagine this in what there is about a different language version except English a little.
I am about "USB2.0" next, but there are a similar problem and problems such as "vendor ID", and its handling becomes indistinct.
It is "a boot loader" and those adaptability that I have a hard time most.
At first let me examine this part.

40
NC Pod / Re: Anyone tried the new plugin yet ?
« on: May 19, 2007, 08:51:15 PM »
I cannot do reading of "firm ware".
I continue testing it for another one year.
I cannot confirm it then which part I become an error in.
Are not there a test driver and a laboratory method of a loader?


Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 »