Hello Guest it is April 26, 2024, 04:18:58 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Ya-Nvr-No

41
Mach4 General Discussion / Re: Cutter height advancement problem
« on: May 08, 2017, 10:10:50 AM »
you would have to increment all your Z's to move down the same amount, correct?
#103=0 (make sure this is done too in the main)
#103=[#103-#100] (add a step down just for the arcs)
example Z[1.545902+#103]
thou I have to admit I don't remember creating 3d arcs like your trying
but if it runs your one loop fine now, then I see no reason that adding the step down should not work.

your original code;
G91 Z-0.001                     (step down 0.001 per pass)
G00 X0.250409 Z1.500977 "This is an incremental move too, but to where ????? from where ?????"
G90 "set it back to absolute moves"

I thought your original start depth was Z1.500977 now its 0
but admit I did not look close and notice that was an incremental position from who knows where, as there was no reference position move before it.
So not sure wtf your up too really or where your starting at.
Scary code, as your original code started, going vertical then step back down.
Re-think your approach
always look one line at a time and say to yourself "from where I'm at, what setting & position do I need to get me to the place I want to be next"

42
Mach4 General Discussion / Re: Cutter height advancement problem
« on: May 05, 2017, 06:27:47 PM »
wefinish
you have a good start, you just need to learn to use pound variables to increment the steps down

here is an example of one I posted years ago of how to increment.
http://www.machsupport.com/forum/index.php/topic,16372.msg147299.html#msg147299

all my gcode other than some profiles and 3d contours are all variable based
as most routines are repetitions of whittling away material. (really sweet for lathe routines, turning  facing, threading)
cleaner shorter code and easier for me to write and edit for the next similar routine.
so the path "like you have" is a call with M98 from the main routine and the first thing it does is add the step increment down variable for the Z position variable
ever time it re-enters the loop it computes the new Z depth variable.
just remember to set the Z increment position variable to zero before calling the loop

good luck have fun


43
General Mach Discussion / Re: ISO, BT, NT Taper angle
« on: January 08, 2017, 11:10:09 AM »
Your welcome

did find this info that might verify for you:

http://www.practicalmachinist.com/vb/general/what-angle-bt40-taper-272649/

Good luck Have Fun

44
General Mach Discussion / Re: ISO, BT, NT Taper angle
« on: January 08, 2017, 08:59:13 AM »
 ;)  I just had to machine some grinder spindle hubs over the holidays. So I wrote a program (using Arts Gearotic/Auggie/Monkey C code) to help me understand the start and stop points for my lathe

Interested to see if these are correct for you; I used the major OD dimension and a length of a holder I'd found on the net.
24/7 = 12/3.5 = 3.5" per foot

I'd verified my grinder spindle taper dimensions with autocad.
the trick to my programming was to remember the taper is included angle not a right triangle. So the calculations had to take that into account.

I modified a Bridgeport spindle a few years ago with my tool post grinder on a manual lathe, still works great for my needs. Now handles both R8 and Cat30 collets.

45
I did a quick test in Auggie's Simulator to see if it would run.

notice I removed the start and stop of the laser control as Auggie takes care of it with movement.

Does need a provision for adding Mcodes for my Air Blow On/Off Mcodes M103/M104

be an added bonus if it recognized "\n" the end of line command, so we could input multiple commands example: M104\n%


46
I have to agree with Tweakie, this is not "truth in advertising", never seen any posts where any other groups were involved.

 ???
 ::)

47
I showed, how to do axis squaring using LUA scripting Sept 2015
admit I have not tried it in over a year, as things might have changed.

but the principle steps I am sure would be the same.
Note: you might have to add some wait states for motors to finish.
as I never tested on a master slave router
I just seen in the sim it runs very fast.

http://www.machsupport.com/forum/index.php/topic,27162.msg214343.html#msg214343

48
Thanks

Here are a couple of Wedding gifts I made this year.

49
Here is a couple of during and after cutouts using HD foam and house paint

50
Show"N"Tell ( Your Machines) / Re: The "Mach4" 3D Laser Build
« on: May 16, 2016, 02:04:55 PM »
very true finding or creating 3d models is the challenge.

Here is some foam and acrylic burns
the one foam burn is 55mm thru