... but is trying to achieve somethings that cannot be achieved...
Sorry Jim (can I call you Jim
) - I don't agree.
First, let's assume that we'll accept blending: As you say, when it comes to the rightangle we'll actually get an arc. Let's assume that arc is of radius theta - where theta will depend on the accel capabilities of the machine and the FR we're trying to achieve.
Now let's not accept blending: The machine (as you say again) must come to a stop momentarilly at the right angle. BUT- and here's the nub - if the radius of the other arc corners are greater than theta, we already know that the system can handle an arc of theta without slowing so there is absolutely no need for any slow down for the arcs. i.e. it should be perfectly possible to cut Andreas path with a stop at the rightangle and no slowdowns for the rest (which I think is what he wants and is expecting).
I do not see how the software can interpret what you want, unless you tell it, therefore you can make settings for the norm, for example, constant velocity, but you would then have to tell the machine if you required anything different for a particular corner.
And that is exactly what all the CV settings are for. i.e. when CV should blend and when it should not. But here I think is the problem: I've noticed that all the CV settings are different depending on what version of Mach your using - which makes it really hard for us to talk about. Also the UG hasn't been updated to reflect the latest CV settings, so this tends to make them (to me anyway and I assume also to Anreas) virtually impossible to understand and to set correctly to get the desired result. Or maybe they just don't work that well even if you can find a way to set them up - I don't know.
Guest
Show Posts
- Anyone else want to comment - go on - you know you want to 