Hello Guest it is April 27, 2024, 12:13:17 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - stirling

1921
Where I was coming from with my suggestion of using 3 pins was:

Yes, it SHOULD work with just one pin - BUT it isn't and I'm suspecting a bug - not unheard of - even in Mach   ::)

It should work with just one pin because when acting as a limit - i.e. at any time other than when you command "ref all home" all Mach does is react to any limit input by deadstopping all axis - it doesn't care nor need to know which switch was hit - it just dead stops - period.

With a "ref all home" - by default Mach homes each axis SEQUENTIALLY and so again only needs one input. ONE advantage to using 3 pins is that you can (if you want) make Mach home all 3 axis in parallel.

I can't help but think at the moment you're making things more difficult by splitting this accross two threads and also trying to get home offsets sorted at the same time. Personally I'd forget this for the moment and concentrate on getting simple homing to work as it should.

My guess at what is happening is that Mach is homing Z but when it hits the switch its confusing the input as not only a home on Z but ALSO as a limit hit on X and/or Y. Like I say this shouldn't happen but...

From the point of view of homing, everything you've apparantly done is correct and yet it still isn't working. Try 3 pins. If that works then it more or less proves a bug in Mach with one pin. If not I'll take all this back and admit defeat   ;D

Cheers

Ian

EDIT: I've just read your other thread again (see what I mean about two threads!) and on post 9 you've said you get a limit message when you home. That confirms (to me at least) that it's a bug as I've said above.

1922
General Mach Discussion / Re: Machine Coordinates ????
« on: December 17, 2007, 03:17:10 PM »
Quick win? - I'd consider splitting your switches (2 per axis) accross 3 input pins. Bet that'll work just fine.

1923
General Mach Discussion / Re: Probe normally open/close?
« on: December 17, 2007, 08:21:20 AM »
Mach's probe default is active high (a cross in active low) which is correct for a NC probe, which is what you say you have,  so something doesn't seem to add up here unless you've already changed it in ports n pins.

1924
I was always taught to accept a compliment with good grace - so cheers Brett - a man of rare insight I believe ;D

1925
I'd like to think it's the former, but then if I'm the latter, I would wouldn't I?  ;D

1926
General Mach Discussion / Re: Trouble cutting accurate parts
« on: December 15, 2007, 04:55:39 AM »
just a thought but what's the (theoretical) resolution of your machine in:

steps?
and
microsteps?

1927
Things that could potentially stop the homing procedure finishing properly:

1) switch bounce leading Mach to "think" it's come off the switch prematurely. see config/general config - debounce (top right of dialog)
2) your switch is prematurely closing for some other reason - coming off the cam/ramp whatever perhaps? - i.e. once a home switch is hit it must stay hit until Mach has a chance to roll off.

edit: Hood posted while I was composing - looks like we're thinking similarly :)

1928
General Mach Discussion / Re: Fun with Mach3 at the shop
« on: December 15, 2007, 04:34:12 AM »
ouch  ::)

1929
I tried to set it up so when it hits the home switch, it will back off of it automatically but I cant seem to get it to do that, How does that work and were do I set that up at?

Hi Bill - You don't have to set anything up. The backoff is part of the (inbuilt) homing behaviour. Not of course to be confused with hitting a limit which does not backoff. Are you saying when you command home it doesn't backoff?

1930
General Mach Discussion / Re: Continuation after tool change
« on: December 14, 2007, 12:15:06 PM »
An update - I visited Art on the paradise resort of Yahoo and he's now fixed this. (R2.62b.000). It's not entirely clear when the M6End macro changed but it now appears to be back the way it was. Good to know we were'nt going crazy and imagining things after all  ;D

Cheers

Ian