Hello Guest it is April 29, 2024, 12:59:18 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - HimyKabibble

61
General Mach Discussion / Re: smoother circles?
« on: February 27, 2014, 02:42:46 PM »
There are several very good true CAD systems for cheap, or even free.  For years, I used QCAD, which does AutoCAD DXF/DWG files.  It's only $40 and works great.  There are numerous free CAD packages, some good, some not so much.  But I'd bet virtually any of them would be better than CorelDraw, which was never intended for doing CAD - it's for drawing, not drafting.

Regards,
Ray L.

62
General Mach Discussion / Re: Shield grounded at one end only
« on: February 07, 2014, 06:01:55 PM »
Thanks again guys - meanwhile another (related) question: When we talk about noise - we're talking about induced voltages right? Any ideas on what levels we could be talking about? i.e. what sort of voltages can be induced into a screen?

It's not hardly that simple....  There are many types of noise, and many ways for it to cause problems.  One of the purposes of a shielded cable is to provide a constant impedance over the length of the cable.  A break in the shield causes a change in impedance, which can cause the signal to be reflected back to the source, even in the absence of any external noise sources.  Noise can couple capacitively, magnetically, or electrically.  It's a very complex business.  Working with 5V signals, it's not terribly diffcult to get induced noise of the same magnitude, or greater, than the signal itself.

That said, you really should not havve any problems it you follow some pretty basic good grounding, and routing, practices, and keep the signal impedances as low as possible, by using stiff pull-up resistors.  A good shield, connected at the source end only, should work just fine, except in unusual cases.  Connecting them at both ends *can* work better, but only if the entire system is well-understood.  In the typical hobby CNC case, it's not, beause you don't know how things are connected inside the power supplies, motor drivers, BOBs, etc.  Connecting at one end will avoid a lot of potential ground loops.

My machines are wired with shields connected at the source end only.  All my limit and home switches, and other signals are 5V only, but with 300 ohm pull-ups.  I even run the servo motor cables and their encoder cables side-by-side, actually Zip-tied to each other about every 12 inches, for almost 20 feet, and I've never had a single noise-related problem.

Regards,
Ray L.

63
General Mach Discussion / Re: Gecko G320X vs. Copley 303 drives
« on: February 07, 2014, 05:45:44 PM »
I've used Geckos for years, and never had a problem.  No experience with Copleys.  However, I fail to see the connection between PWM frequency and encoder counts - they're pretty much unrelated.  I don't even know what the PWM rate for the Geckos is, but I run mine with 20,000 PPR on two axes, 20,320 on a third, and 96,000 on a fourth.  All work just fine.  I think perhaps you're imagining a problem where none exists.

Regards,
Ray L.

64
General Mach Discussion / Re: Mach4 tapping video
« on: January 20, 2014, 10:11:53 PM »
Brian,

I'm curious....  I see significant under-feed on the way down, especially as the spindle stops, and even more significant over-feed on the way up.  Looks to me like it's probably approaching the travel limits of the tension/compression holder.  Is the coordination not occurring during part of the cycle, like after the spindle is turned off at the end of the down-feed?  Or is the programmed feed wrong for that tap?

Regards,
Ray L.

65
General Mach Discussion / Re: gcode Change
« on: January 20, 2014, 10:57:53 AM »
Or he's looking at machine coordinates?

Regards,
Ray L.

66
General Mach Discussion / Re: Air Cooled Spindle Hole
« on: January 15, 2014, 10:49:53 PM »
A high speed spindle like that would NEVER have a grease Zerk on it.  The bearings would be very lightly lubricated, and shielded to keep the grease in.  Grease it, and you'll ruin it.

Regards,
Ray L.

67
General Mach Discussion / Re: PWM Base Frequency
« on: January 07, 2014, 02:47:19 PM »
PWM frequency is typically 50Hz.  Little to gain by going faster, and it can reduce resolution, depending on your kernel speed.

Regards,
Ray L.

68
General Mach Discussion / Re: Rigid Tapping
« on: January 05, 2014, 11:39:33 AM »
I'll muddy the waters by throwing out another definition:  Rigid Tapping means simply using a tap rigidly mounted to the spindle.  It says nothing about how precisely you can stop.  It simply implies (requires!) that the axial motion be precisely coordinated with the rotary motion, to avoid breaking the tool.  This can be done with any kind of spindle drive, and a spindle encoder.  Without the encoder, or other means of providing precise coordination, you must use a "forgiving", non-rigid, tool holder, like a tension/compression holder, or a tapping head.

Regards,
Ray L.

69
General Mach Discussion / Re: Removed EMI, but still need debounce?
« on: January 01, 2014, 11:53:20 PM »
Ferrite beads will do absolutely NOTHING of value - they are only for reducing radiated and conducted emissions at MUCH higher frequencies - far beyond what logic circuits will respond to.

Regards,
Ray L.

70
General Mach Discussion / Re: Problem with G42 cutter radius compensation
« on: December 21, 2013, 09:52:18 AM »
Mach3 tries (though does not always succeed 100%) to adhere to the G-code usage as defined in this book:

http://www.amazon.com/CNC-Programming-Handbook-Third-Edition/dp/0831133473/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1387637394&sr=8-1&keywords=Smid+CNC+Programming

This book is what the Mach3 (and v4) authors treat as their "bible" when it comes to G-code usage and machine behavior.

Regards,
Ray L.