31
Mach4 General Discussion / Re: Mach4 Printer Port Discussions
« on: July 19, 2014, 04:36:39 AM »
I read opinions from smarter people than myself. like Tweakie. And I quote
"Art’s ‘Darwin’, parallel port driver, performed beautifully during the tests with no faults or bugs to report. It is very easy to set-up and the motion produced is just so smooth it is difficult to describe the difference from Mach3."
My experience is VERY different which makes me think I am doing some rather stupid things. I am using Darwin 1.08 with Mach4 1888
Firstly I abandoned any idea of using Metric. The results just confused the hell out of me.
For the life of me I could not get B axis (motor 4) selected as slave to Y axis. Had to settle for A axis (motor 3) Just could not figure how to get it to allow me to select B as slave.
Maybe that is a built in limitation of hobby version. That would be a shame as I have one slaved axis and also a 4th axis (rotary). That would blow Mach4 out of the water for me as a future option.
Dual axis homing I have not worked out yet. Master and slave work well together up until I reference that axis. Then they try to move in different directions.
However all that is small potatoes compared with the smoothness of operation (or lack of it) compared with Mach3.
25000 kernal speed. Good driver test graphic. Time in interrupt approx 7 micro seconds (is this my problem?)
No hardware changes. Start up Mach3 and all is sweet again, as it has been for years.
With Mach4 it sounds awful but does move and I don't think positional integrity is affected. (I need to check that)
Any ideas what silly mistake I have made?
Greolt
"Art’s ‘Darwin’, parallel port driver, performed beautifully during the tests with no faults or bugs to report. It is very easy to set-up and the motion produced is just so smooth it is difficult to describe the difference from Mach3."
My experience is VERY different which makes me think I am doing some rather stupid things. I am using Darwin 1.08 with Mach4 1888
Firstly I abandoned any idea of using Metric. The results just confused the hell out of me.
For the life of me I could not get B axis (motor 4) selected as slave to Y axis. Had to settle for A axis (motor 3) Just could not figure how to get it to allow me to select B as slave.
Maybe that is a built in limitation of hobby version. That would be a shame as I have one slaved axis and also a 4th axis (rotary). That would blow Mach4 out of the water for me as a future option.
Dual axis homing I have not worked out yet. Master and slave work well together up until I reference that axis. Then they try to move in different directions.
However all that is small potatoes compared with the smoothness of operation (or lack of it) compared with Mach3.
25000 kernal speed. Good driver test graphic. Time in interrupt approx 7 micro seconds (is this my problem?)
No hardware changes. Start up Mach3 and all is sweet again, as it has been for years.
With Mach4 it sounds awful but does move and I don't think positional integrity is affected. (I need to check that)
Any ideas what silly mistake I have made?
Greolt