Messages

5951

Mach SDK plugin questions and answers. / Re: Impact engraving plugin

« on: April 01, 2011, 06:40:53 AM »

Is the total width of the created (double) work the same as the Width (X Axis) you specified in the plugin or is it wider ?
When using the plugin are you clicking on Calculate Parameters after making any changes ?

I am running out of ideas now 

Tweakie.

5952

Mach SDK plugin questions and answers. / Re: Impact engraving plugin

« on: April 01, 2011, 06:10:31 AM »

Removing my license file made no difference so it does not matter if you are using a licensed version or not it should still work OK.

Could you please try with a square image (attached) and see what happens ?

Tweakie.

5953

Mach SDK plugin questions and answers. / Re: Impact engraving plugin

« on: April 01, 2011, 05:49:09 AM »

Stand by one, I will remove the license from my version and see just what happens with an unlicensed version.
Back soon.

Tweakie.

5954

Mach SDK plugin questions and answers. / Re: Impact engraving plugin

« on: April 01, 2011, 05:34:46 AM »

Are you running the latest version of Mach ?
It is also possible (although not confirmed) that you need to be running a licensed version, not the Demo version as per the .xml you sent me.

Tweakie.

5955

LazyCam (Beta) / Re: Issue with offset

« on: April 01, 2011, 04:58:25 AM »

Mike,

LC is absolutely brilliant at what it does well but it is far from being perfect.
OK, you have to pay for it but there is a lot of available CAD/CAM software out there that does a much better job with pockets and offsets.
For a while I used the free version of CamBam and once you get used to it's little quirks it makes a great job of creating the offset GCode.

Tweakie.

5956

Share Your GCode / Re: Suppressor Designs?

« on: April 01, 2011, 04:32:22 AM »

Is that the same thing as a silencer ?

Tweakie.

5957

Mach SDK plugin questions and answers. / Re: Impact engraving plugin

« on: April 01, 2011, 04:08:10 AM »

Two things.....

Make sure you are using the latest version. http://www.machsupport.com/forum/index.php/topic,16446.msg111507.html#msg111507 Copy the DLL from here into your Mach3 / PlugIns folder.

Make sure the axis Scale DRO's are at +1.0000

Tweakie.

5958

General Mach Discussion / Re: testing mach3, cannot run two axis at the same time

« on: April 01, 2011, 03:33:33 AM »

Then I would set the motor current at 1.68 Amps per phase and use a 24Volt power supply rated at 6 Amps output if I was using these steppers but you need to check that your driver board is OK with the 24 Volts.

Tweakie.

5959

General Mach Discussion / Re: Stopping Distance

« on: April 01, 2011, 02:46:40 AM »

Hi Daryn,

The configuration of your system plays a major part here. It is preferable to configure your 'enable' signal to remain active, irrespective of an e-stop or fault condition and in this way the stepper acts as a brake to the axis travel (a heavy Z axis driven with ball screws would almost certainly continue its movement until the tool contacts the work or fixture if it's drive power was completely removed by a fault condition or e-stop).
On my system it would be totally impractical to mount the limit switches in such a position that they would prevent the mechanical stop being reached when the axis is being driven at it's full G0 speed (the switches would reduce my operating area far too much) but they have been positioned to prevent the mechanical stop being reached when the axis is driven at my maximum G1 cutting feedrate. Unfortunately everything has to be a compromise.

Tweakie.

5960

General Mach Discussion / Re: testing mach3, cannot run two axis at the same time

« on: April 01, 2011, 02:26:00 AM »

Could be not enough current - this is set and current limited by the driver.
The motors will have a maximum current rating and this must never be exceeded. The voltage rating can be exceeded and it is not unusual for this to be between 5 and 20 times the motor's rated voltage.

What type and rating of power supply are you using ?
What is the rating of your steppers (0.4A 12V ?)

Tweakie.