3301
General Mach Discussion / Re: Winding springs using Mach control
« on: June 30, 2016, 12:16:22 PM »
Just a thought…
Hard to explain but initially the part which snags the end of the piano wire is free to rotate on the arbour. When the spindle is up to speed, a clutch is tripped which locks the part which snags the wire and the arbour together. Spring winding then progresses in line with the feeder toolpost movement until the spring has been wound. Not sure how you cater for the spring-back but that's another problem.
In the days way back when, IBM patented a flat spring clutch which provided the high-torque drive for their Selectric typewriters (The motor shaft rotated continuously but the main shaft only rotated in 180 deg. increments controlled by this spring clutch). The actual IBM clutch would not be man enough to handle the torque required for 2mm piano wire but the principle of design would be sound.
Just as a distraction, I had lots of fun last year constructing a guitar string winder… http://www.machsupport.com/forum/index.php/topic,28721.0.html
Tweakie.
Hard to explain but initially the part which snags the end of the piano wire is free to rotate on the arbour. When the spindle is up to speed, a clutch is tripped which locks the part which snags the wire and the arbour together. Spring winding then progresses in line with the feeder toolpost movement until the spring has been wound. Not sure how you cater for the spring-back but that's another problem.
In the days way back when, IBM patented a flat spring clutch which provided the high-torque drive for their Selectric typewriters (The motor shaft rotated continuously but the main shaft only rotated in 180 deg. increments controlled by this spring clutch). The actual IBM clutch would not be man enough to handle the torque required for 2mm piano wire but the principle of design would be sound.
Just as a distraction, I had lots of fun last year constructing a guitar string winder… http://www.machsupport.com/forum/index.php/topic,28721.0.html
Tweakie.