Messages

1841

Third party software and hardware support forums. / Re: Removal of SmoothStepper

« on: September 22, 2016, 01:36:12 AM »

Under Function Cfg’s select Reset Device Sel…
Click OK then restart Mach3
This should then let you select Parallel Port operation (assuming the drivers are installed).
The drivers can be installed by running the DriverTest (from the Mach3 folder) – If DriverTest.exe is not present then you need to re-install Mach3 (make a backup of the existing Mach3 folder first).

Tweakie.

1842

Building or Buying a Wood routing table.. Beginnners guide.. / Re: Problem with upgrade nema 23 to nema 34

« on: September 21, 2016, 10:57:21 AM »

So your NEMA34’s are stalling out at around 500 rpm.
Your gearing has increased the torque required to drive the axis by a factor of 3 and my best guess would be that your motors do not have quite enough torque at that particular rpm (I am assuming you have increased the DM556 current setting to match the NEMA 34’s current rating).

Just my opinion…

Possibility of mid-band resonance but this could easily be ruled out by attaching a small (reasonably light-weight) flywheel directly to your motor shaft. This would alter the mass of the armature and if the behaviour of the motor was different (different point of stall) then I would investigate fitting the proper dampeners to your motors.

Alternately reducing the up-gearing would reduce the required axis torque. This would increase motor rpm (reducing motor drive torque) but I would expect >1000 rpm from those motors when driven at 48 volts.

Tweakie.

1843

Building or Buying a Wood routing table.. Beginnners guide.. / Re: Problem with upgrade nema 23 to nema 34

« on: September 21, 2016, 08:38:40 AM »

I am confused about your 1/3 gearing. Is the maximum rpm of your NEMA 34's now lower or higher than the maximum rpm of your NEMA 23's ??

Tweakie.

1844

Mach4 General Discussion / MOVED: Mach4 and modbus - help needed

« on: September 21, 2016, 08:19:53 AM »

This topic has been moved to Modbus.

http://www.machsupport.com/forum/index.php?topic=33301.0

1845

General Mach Discussion / Re: Does this product exist?

« on: September 21, 2016, 04:04:19 AM »

A few years back I designed a low profile tool setter which was intended as an open source project for all. There must have been something there that I had not realized because I was approached with a request to sell the design. Well I sold it (so cannot disclose any further details than have already been posted) but, to this day, I have never seen it on sale.
The related thread is here http://www.machsupport.com/forum/index.php/topic,21525.0.html and post #54 shows the overrun ring which triggered the EStop in case of emergency.
I use the prototype many times a day and it has never overrun so I consider the G31 to be 99.9999% reliable. Just why it behaves for some and not for others is probably one of those great mysteries that may never be solved.

If I built one, then there has got to be a fail-safe probe plate available on the market somewhere.  

Tweakie.

1846

General Mach Discussion / Re: For Tarus CM5P

« on: September 19, 2016, 11:21:31 AM »

It is my understanding that compatible post processors are available for both PowerMill and MasterCam so if they can produce the required Gcode then Mach3 can make it.

The Tarus is bit of a specialist machine and exactly what you would need in the way of hardware will depend on the existing servo’s / stepper’s / drive’s / etc. and what can be used and what needs replacement. As I have no experience of retrofitting such a machine I am unable to offer any advice in this respect, however, I am sure there are others here on the forum who can assist.

Tweakie.

1847

Share Your GCode / Re: Barb wire gcode

« on: September 19, 2016, 01:58:29 AM »

Try a web search for 'barb wire .dxf' this should bring up some free options such as https://www.vecteezy.com/free-vector/barbed-wire
The desired design can then be incorporated into Aspire, converted to vector and away you go.

Tweakie.

1848

General Mach Discussion / Re: For Tarus CM5P

« on: September 19, 2016, 01:50:25 AM »

Mach3 and Mach4 are both capable of controlling a 5 axis machine but you have to consider the compatibility of the CAD/CAM software you would be planning to use. Mach3, for example, does not compute kinematic motion – this would have to have been done within the CAM software prior to creating the Gcode. Mach4 will, I am sure, be capable of kinematics but it may be quite some time in the future before this feature is available.

Currently, ‘Teach file’ operation is available with Mach3 and also operation with a 5 axis plugin being developed here; http://www.machsupport.com/forum/index.php/topic,32107.0.html

Tweakie. 

1849

Third party software and hardware support forums. / Re: Xhc HB04 MPG Pendent with Mach4

« on: September 18, 2016, 01:44:38 AM »

Hi mkullman,

Try posting a question in the Mach4 section of the forum (http://www.machsupport.com/forum/index.php/board,94.0.html).
It's quite possible that someone there may have some key information to get you started again.

Tweakie.

1850

General Mach Discussion / Re: Different speed in material and above

« on: September 14, 2016, 04:54:16 AM »

Usualy I make G code with ArtCAM.
Is there any software that can change G00 G01 speeds automatically instead of me doing it manually in Notepad ?

The Gcode G00 / G01 moves are usually automatically taken care of by the post processor used in ArtCam.
Are you using their Mach2 post processor ?

Tweakie.