Hello Guest it is May 06, 2021, 06:57:09 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - GENX

Pages: 1 2 »
General Mach Discussion / Re: Mach 3 Display not showing G Code anymore
« on: August 19, 2016, 10:26:09 AM »
Roadrunner still disappeared.

I read something about the IJ Mode being absolute or Inc. and to change the status. I don't know what those mean or do. But I know there is a Gcode 90.1 in my custom piece....

General Mach Discussion / Re: Mach 3 Display not showing G Code anymore
« on: August 19, 2016, 09:33:09 AM »
I need to learn more about G Code for sure.

I had set the machine up in imperial, but drew the G code of my custom piece in Metric.

Mr Tweakie,
Any resources(books, links) you may provide for a novice on G code will be happily devoured.....

I added G20 to the top of Code at the very first line and road runner disappeared. 

General Mach Discussion / Re: Mach 3 Display not showing G Code anymore
« on: August 19, 2016, 08:47:06 AM »
I might say the status: shows
Current point same as end point of arc, Block G2x19.763

 Maybe Mach3 doesn't like the G code? But why is the road runner now so small now compared to my table when before it was too big to fit?

General Mach Discussion / Mach 3 Display not showing G Code anymore
« on: August 19, 2016, 08:39:22 AM »
Did some testing. I have the Demo mode.

I loaded the road runner from the stock templates. I noticed that the scale of the road runner was larger than my table. I have a Little Machine shop 3990 (Sieg X2).
So no problem I reduced the scale to .5 next to the DRO read out. All seemed to be working fine. I executed some test runs with a marker and it drew the road runner for me exactly to the scale it presented in relation to my table. My table is accurate in that the cross hairs accurately represent the homing limits I have set up.

Then I imported some gcode I had created for a new cut by fusion360.

I tried some real live cuts with this new G Code. It worked fine on the piece. I did have some user error and now I am attempting to recut the piece, But somehow now the g code loaded and tollbooth regenerated the display tool window does not show my Gcode as very big for the custom piece. Matter of fact I can not see it hardly at all If I go back and load the roadrunner it is now VERY SMALL in relation to my table display!

I can only see the stock road runner. If I Regen the toolpath it does not make my custom piece bigger either.
I have to change the scale to 20x to generate an image that is as big as it was when I initially set it up to be.
Before I could see a toolpath of the G code on my custom piece. Now I cannot see anything. I even executed the code and it Cut it right. I go back to the same G code and load it and I get nothing.

Any thoughts?

No I think I have it hooked up right.
See attached link: Page 7

Terminal (input) 1 is pin 10,11,12,13,14 respectively. I have each respective input in mach 3 coordinating to the proper pin# of this literature.

I wonder if the ESS Smooth Stepper is interfering somehow? I will need to check when I get back home.

Hi all.
I am having trouble getting my Homing switches to register within Mach 3.

See attached wiring diagram.

My motor power is 48 Volt. Steppers... I was wondering if this is correct of if the limits should be 5 volt signal?

This wiring schematic does not make sense to me as I read somewhere that the G540 puts out 5v+ to PC on terminal #1. If that is the case would not terminal #1 be common to all the limit switches with the individual load side of the switches landing in their respective unique terminal so you can show which axis is homed/limited in Mach3? (I am aware that you can place all the homing switches on one input and have mach home them one at a time.)

However in reading the Gecko literature I think I do have each limit switch appropriately set up to the proper ports and pins input within Mach 3.
If on ports and pins inputs, I x out the active low and x out the emulated button, on the diagnostics screen the LEDS for M1, M2, M3 homing are constantly lit. Under this wiring configuration when I trip a limit I do not see them blink. If I un-x the active low; Then inspect the diagnostics page I do not see a signal LED light up when I trip the limit switches. This tells me the limits are not communicating with Mach.

The cable to kimits I have is 12'- 18 awg.  I tested voltage to + terminal at the return terminal of the Gecko upon tripping the limit switch and it is 36v (starts at 48) so there is some voltage drop. Could this be the reason? I need to shorten the wire or increase the size?

My questions are: at what voltage should these operate at? I read somewhere that there is a pull up resistor that sends signal. But I don't know what type of wiring config I am supposed to be doing now as it's all convoluted...


LENR -  CF Yes.

There has been no way to systemically control the reactions, but I do believe I have a novel process to manipulate them and thereby create a repeatable amount of energy.
 By taking the elements to mono-atomic form, re-synthesize them and "instruct" them where to recombine,mother nature will make the magic happen.

I was having trouble with my W7 64bit so I decided to use XP. I have not given up on trouble shooting it, just seemed superfluous since I had an XP OS ready to go.

Very interesting resume'.

I am a humble amateur, but I have a few ideas involving the manipulation of atoms and processing them for LENR (Low energy Nuc reaction) involving group 10 elements and Hydrogen and Oxygen.
This certainly gives ME energy reactions at night and on the weekends!

Cool times we live in now. We are going through a renaissance and few can be bothered about it.

I am tweaking/dialing in my mill and trying to understand Mach 3. I have to say it is a pretty sophisticated program for it's time indeed. Too bad XP is end of life. I tried to get Mach 4 to run on my windows 7 64bit puter with ESS smoothstepper but ran into problems.

I have recently switched to Autodesk's: Fusion360.
It is free for startups who make <$100K/yr or free for hobbiests.


In one package. I love it!

What research did you retire from?

I am attempting to mill out a small plasma chamber to study a few ION experiments I have lined up.

In retrospect, I think you are right. Control point jogging at all times to be consistent will be my policy.
thanks for the advice

Pages: 1 2 »