1
Mach4 General Discussion / Re: Mesa FPGA cards
« on: March 13, 2020, 05:15:01 PM »
I had forgotten that Mach does not have the same internal configuration ability within its hal layer that Linuxcnc does. Since Mach configuration is done with check boxes the features that I'm used to using and depend on would not be available.
I agree that the closed loop part should be within the FPGA programining and that is way outside of my knowledge base to accomplish. My gantry milling machine does not use closed loop functions so I will concentrate on converting it from Mach3 to Mach4 instead of proceeding on the knee mill.
Just out of curiosity would the use of windows embedded instead of the regular windows versions offer a performance increase or is it just a stripped down version that is still not real time capable.
I will also do more research on available motion controllers with closed loop abilities.
I agree that the closed loop part should be within the FPGA programining and that is way outside of my knowledge base to accomplish. My gantry milling machine does not use closed loop functions so I will concentrate on converting it from Mach3 to Mach4 instead of proceeding on the knee mill.
Just out of curiosity would the use of windows embedded instead of the regular windows versions offer a performance increase or is it just a stripped down version that is still not real time capable.
I will also do more research on available motion controllers with closed loop abilities.