Hello Guest it is March 28, 2024, 11:02:59 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - tstbeyaz

Pages: 1
1

I am building machine tools and have access and make use of   Heidenhein itc530 (germany) , Fanuc 18imB (japan), sytnec (taiwan) , LNC (China), GSK (china).  All use the true close loop control such as following error and velocity error in the Gcode level as standard. I am well informed that Mach3 is open loop controlled, But I wish that the MACH3 software come to the level of above with the help of improving technologies such as external motion hardware and availibity of very fast interconnection standards such as USB3.0 (5gbps) and sata III (6gbps).

What are the main concerns?

- Unreliability of USB3.0 and sataIII for real time control and feedback

-Development effort is huge that a 1-2 man team can not handle.

- Is the path too long (the feedback should come first from the servo to the motion control hardware and then transferred to the Mach3. ). How does heidenhein do this with a celeron 400Mhz PC and a motion controller?


Does a concept exist towards thşs implementation for future maybe in 3-4 years.  Or this is totally another type of business or method that does not/ can not belong to the future of Mach3.

Best regards.

tstbeyaz

Pages: 1