Machsupport Forum
G-Code, CAD, and CAM => LazyCam (Beta) => Topic started by: NSchlee on March 18, 2006, 07:30:19 PM
-
How do you select a cutting tool in LC?
Is it done thru Mach?
Neal
-
At this point there is not a was but it is on the list of things to be added soon...
-
Thanks for the reply, Brian, can't wait!
Lazy Cam with tool selection and cutter compensation will create an even larger demand and interest in Mach software.
Neal
-
Neal Comp is working now :) All you have to do is type in the Tool dia that you are going to run in mach3...
-
Thanks, Brian
Neal
-
Hello,
I'm a newby in CNC machines and I'm trying to get a bit familiar with Mach3 and Lazycam so forgive me if I'm asking silly questions ;)
I was currently trying to specify the tool diameter in LC but I can't find find where to type it.
Compared to the tutorial video, my LC screen is also slightly different as the "execute" button does not appear.
Is the fact that I don't have the licence yet can explain that LC doesn't show the whole functions ? (I downloaded the Mach3 version 1.90.031 with LC included)
Thanks
Jean-Louis
-
The leading move must be the same size or larger than the tool that you would like to use. once you have done that you check Tool Comp in the Post options. This will Add G41,G42 and G40's to the program. In Mach3 you can just type in the Dia of the tool that you would like to cut with (that is less than the lead in move). I will make a video n the next few days (I think it is time for a NEW video).
-
Thanks Brian
It works fine !
Jean-Louis
-
Good owork getting that working! There are no Doc's telling how to do it at this point so you are a Good test case!
Thanks
Brian
-
Brian,
Just to give you a feedback of my little experience, I made an other test yesterday with a very simple drawing of a circle and a rectangle inside a larger rectangle (see attached "test" file).
I set the leadings (10 units / circular / inside left / climb mill for inside cuts and 10 units / circular / outside right / climb mill for the larger rectangle) but when generating the GCode I noticed two problems :
1- LCam put G42 instead of G41 for the first inside chain (circle)
2- no G41 (or even G42) was generated for the second inside chain (small rectangle) and for the outside chain (larger rectangle). It however generates properly the G40 code at the end of each chain.
That's maybe a bug of the beta version ?
I tried to circumvent the problem by disabling the creation by LCam of the G41/G42 and by inserting manually a G41 at the beginning of the code. But as it also disables the G40 creation, when the cutter goes to the origin of the next rapid movement (without moving up the Z axis), depending on the position of the leadOut, the tool may then cut where it shouldn't do. (hope my explanations are clear enough :-\)
Jean-Louis
-
Cool that will help me find the problem!
Thanks
Brian
-
I found the problem and I am fixing it now... it will be in the new release.
-
Thanks Brian ;)
-
Hi Brian,
Thanks for the version 2.0 of LC. I'm very impressed by your reactivity !
So I've tested the new release of LC with the same dxf file.
Everything works fine for the inside chains but for the outside chain, it has generated a G42 code instead of G41.
Sorry to give you some more work ;D
Jean-Louis
-
No problem I will have to look at the code again... I used another test file and I must have missed something! I will see if I can find it.
Thanks
Brian
-
Hi Brian,
I discovered something else regarding this problem that may help you to fix it.
If I set tool 1 (for instance) for both layers (inside and outside) in the layer control, a G42 is generated for the outside chain (as explained previously), but if I set tool 1 for inside layer and tool 2 for outside layer, then the code is properly generated, with G41 for both inside and outside chains.
Hope it helps.
Jean-Louis
-
That is a big help in finding the problem! Thank you!
-
ok i think i know now what to do :-\ ::).. first is to download the latest version and test again. wow! we always have new updated version from time to time.. which is good.
we users just have to check if our versions are up to date. ;)
more power to you all!
-
I a sorry about that... Lcam is going to be a good program but you all are helping us get the bugs out :o So in time you will see it get better and better. I will be working on Lcam for the next few weeks after I get back from the workshop. Thank you and hang in there we will have something that you like in the end!