Machsupport Forum

Mach Discussion => General Mach Discussion => Topic started by: fredjr45 on December 28, 2009, 04:39:43 PM

Title: No pulse line box
Post by: fredjr45 on December 28, 2009, 04:39:43 PM
When running driver test it says excellent, but there in no line in the box.  the pulse per second is 12305.  Sorry if this has been asked before but I could't find it.  Thanks Jimmy.
Title: Re: No pulse line box
Post by: Hood on December 28, 2009, 04:42:20 PM
Try the special driver and see if that helps. It is in the Mach3 folder and double clicking it will install it, if you need to go back to the normal you will also see that in the Mach3 folder and again double clicking will install it.
Hood
Title: Re: No pulse line box
Post by: fredjr45 on December 28, 2009, 05:03:20 PM
Thanks for the quick reply.  I took another look and there is a line,  it is off the scale.  I can see some spike coming down from the top.  How can I get the line in the box.  Thanks, Jimmy
Title: Re: No pulse line box
Post by: Hood on December 28, 2009, 05:05:27 PM
What do you have your kernel set to? I have never seen the line being outwith the box so dont really know what to advise.
Have you tried to see if your motors are working correctly the way it is?
Hood
Title: Re: No pulse line box
Post by: Overloaded on December 28, 2009, 05:20:25 PM
With kernel at 25, pulses are roughly around 40 us so if your speed is 12,305 it would put you up around 80...at the top of the window wouldn't it ?
Title: Re: No pulse line box
Post by: Overloaded on December 28, 2009, 05:22:36 PM
Your pc might be too slow.
Title: Re: No pulse line box
Post by: fredjr45 on December 28, 2009, 05:47:23 PM
What do you have your kernel set to? I have never seen the line being outwith the box so dont really know what to advise.
Have you tried to see if your motors are working correctly the way it is?
Hood

I have the kernal set to 25.  The motors do not run.  This is a new build and are just starting to try and get the motors to run.  Thanks, Jimmy
Title: Re: No pulse line box
Post by: Overloaded on December 28, 2009, 05:49:12 PM
What are the specs. of your PC ?
Title: Re: No pulse line box
Post by: fredjr45 on December 28, 2009, 05:52:46 PM
What are the specs. of your PC ?



I'm not good with computers but I think it is 1600MHz.  I know it is old.
Title: Re: No pulse line box
Post by: Hood on December 28, 2009, 06:17:25 PM
That should be plenty for Mach, min requirements is 1,000MHz. Memory is also important.


Hood
Title: Re: No pulse line box
Post by: fredjr45 on December 29, 2009, 10:13:10 AM
There are 74.5GB of memory.  Thanks, Jimmy
Title: Re: No pulse line box
Post by: Hood on December 29, 2009, 10:17:58 AM
Thats you hard drive size, it is RAM that is important, min if using XP should really be 256 Meg but 512 or more would be better.
Hood
Title: Re: No pulse line box
Post by: fredjr45 on December 29, 2009, 10:53:20 AM
261,424 MB RAM, windows 2000.  I think that is right.  Thanks, Jimmy
Title: Re: No pulse line box
Post by: Hood on December 29, 2009, 11:01:25 AM
Think thats probably Kb, if so then that should be plenty for Mach on windows 2000.

Have you tried the computer with some motors to see how they perform?
Hood
Title: Re: No pulse line box
Post by: fredjr45 on December 29, 2009, 11:21:39 AM
The motors do not run.  I am just starting to get the Mach running.  I did the special driver and now have no pulse.  Thanks, Jimmy
Title: Re: No pulse line box
Post by: Hood on December 29, 2009, 11:24:50 AM
I thought maybe the special driver would work when you said you had no line so best just go back to the original.

Might be worth doing the optimisation steps detailed on the downloads page (near the bottom)
Hood
Title: Re: No pulse line box
Post by: fredjr45 on January 08, 2010, 10:09:51 AM
I changed computers and now have a good pulse rate and line with very little spikes, but the motors still do not run.  I have used the Gecko troubleshooting diagram and have come down to the "check controller timing G203V step input specs: min step '0' time = 0.5 uS min step '1' time =3 uS".  Could someone explan this and how do you correct ifd it is not right.  Thanks, Jimmy