Hello Guest it is May 06, 2024, 12:16:53 PM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - ART

921
General Mach Discussion / Re: Problems threading on the lathe
« on: September 28, 2009, 09:32:51 AM »
Hi Guys:

  The threading is being re-investigated as of this coming week or two. John S has agreed to run some tests for me to see where the wander is at. We're goign to start with the
Printer port single pulse threading, then evaluate the multislot again to document the differences. The wander is caused by a varying of the time the computer see's the index time.
It seems on some computers there is an inherent delay and this causes an overcorrrection that creates a wandering Z position. On other computers it seems not to exist. I still
dont know though if its the computer or the machien causing the variance. The multislot gives me statistics to see how much variance. When I feed it a time based generated pulse
I see no variance here, but using my Emco lathe, I see the index pulse varying in time.

 This means either my motor is varying in speed slightly, ( though I cant see or hear it..) or the sensor itself just isnt that solid in terms of when it activates. More test results should be
coing out soon.

  In current versions the driver was modified to a new timing base, which is more solid. My #interrupts display has since read withing a close number of selected kernal speed. 25005 for 25Khz for example, and very solid. I suspect those with further away numbers, and more variance see worse threads. Perhaps future tests will tell us which it is.

Art
 
 

 

922
General Mach Discussion / Re: Web Cam not working
« on: September 28, 2009, 09:29:56 AM »
Hi Guys:

  The threading is being re-investigated as of this coming week or so. John S has agreed to run some tests for me to see where the wander is at. We're goign to start with the
Printer port single pulse threading, then evaluate the multislot again to document the differences. The wander is caused by a varying of the time the computer see's the index time.
It seems on some computers there is an inherent delay and this causes an overcorrrection that creates a wandering Z position. On other computers it seems not to exist. I still
dont know though if its the computer or the machien causing the variance. The multislot gives me statistics to see how much variance. When I feed it a time based generated pulse
I see no variance here, but using my Emco lathe, I see the index pulse varying in time.

 This means either my motor is varying in speed slightly, ( though I cant see or hear it..) or the sensor itself just isnt that solid in terms of when it activates. More test results should be
coing out soon.

Art

923
Mike:

 Thx, that probably explains it. I havent done anything to support simulation. Tempest is tied into Mach3 because M3 is a great
test platform, but since its written a sa standalone planner, its really just tacked in there where I could. Some functions like
estimate and simulate may or may not work.

thx
Art

924
Mike:

 Interesting... I get no error there, runs fine. Can you send me your xml that your using?

Thx
Art

925
Hi Guys:

  Thx for the testing and the files. Ive identified several bugs in the Z and arc/helix operations.
Also, I added Smoothstepper and other controllers to the output. Let me know how it goes,
all files submitted seem to cut fine..

Art



926
Rab:

 Thx for the test. Ill try some angular tests tomorrow as well.
Cant understand why the squealing.. seems to repond to goto zero fine here, but it may be something to do with angualr motion,
I hadnt done much with the other 6 axis as yet, though I did verify operation a few times..

Art

927
Thx Mike:

  Ill try it out and let you know what I find. I know theres still some bugs in there..

thxx

Art

928
Hi Guys:

 Just to make sure you arent testing in the dark, I went to the shop and downloaded the 25-1 version and cut Grahams Boat hull program posted earlier.
It cut perfect.. ( REAL nice boat hull Graham..). I scaled it to .5 on all 3 axis to stress it some more by making it a shorter segment program. It cut very well,
so you should be OK to cut tests without too much worry, though Id suggest in the air first till your comfortable with that programs responce.

  Ill try to post a photo of the cut piece later on. It turns out a very niuce smooth ( in this case spruce wood) sailboat hull.

Thx for the testing and the tap files. :)

Art

929
Hi Guys:

  Sorry about that, it was indeed doing circles on arcs. Fixed in this version.

Art

930
Hi:

>>So I also pushed the acceleration up from 1200 to 2000 and now it is down to 20 seconds

   It goes to show that the file , when proper physical limits are enforced on the blends has a 20 second time minimum. Mach3 does push the envelope quite a bit so Id expect longer file times on many file types.

Testing continues, good results so far other than the small bugs showing up.. :)

Art