Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
September 23, 2017, 09:39:42 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
* Home Help Search Calendar Links Login Register
+  Machsupport Forum
|-+  Mach Discussion
| |-+  General Mach Discussion
| | |-+  Time to show off my ATC
Pages: 1 2 3 »   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Time to show off my ATC  (Read 11666 times)
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
derek
Active Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 201


View Profile
« on: December 27, 2012, 11:48:04 AM »

Well like so many people after seeing  Dave DeCaussin's ATC on you tube I had my ďI want that!Ē moment.
The thing that put it over the top for me was being able to regrind the r8 to work with the BT30. I settled with using the 4 ball gripper design and Belleville washers for the drawbar pressure. My quill is locked and I use the knee for the Z axis so that made things a little easier. All of the drawbar parts are A2 that I hardened and tempered. The drawbar has about 1000 lbs of pressure. Iím using a 4Ē Bimba flat multi power cylinder. I needed the multi power as I donít have a ton of travel on my Bellevilles. Iíve been using the drawbar setup since July and have had zero problems. I took it apart about 2 months ago and it looked perfect.
When I started working out my design for the ATC I was going to have the carousel on the end of the table and have the X axis bring it over to the spindle. I had a job come up where I really needed some sort of changer so I knocked together a quick tray type. One thing became immediately apparent was that I was running the crap out of the X axis. So out went that idea and I settled on a more traditional ďfly it inĒ design. Over the course of time I settled on a 3 stage system. One stage down to line the forks up with the tool. one stage to engage horizontally and one stage to bring the tool down out of the spindle. There are proximity sensors at the end of each travel. The M6 macro is written so that it operates in a follow the leader fashion. When the first stage proximity activates it triggers the next stage. This works really great and is very safe.   I opted to use slides from cncrouterparts. They are inexpensive, well built and really versatile. They are designed to work with 80/20 extrusion and 1/4Ē CRS flat bar. Iíve used them in a couple of other projects and I was really happy. The carousel is driven by an extra servo motor I had and is designated as a C drive.  Spindle indexing was supposed to accomplished with the new Delta VFD-M I purchased but unfortunately it didnít play nice with my 2 pole motor. I ended up going with a shot pin arrangement until I can afford a new motor.
Terry (BR549) wrote really slick macro for me that makes it all work. He has the spindle stop then turn slowly to the index signal. It then kills the spindle and shoots the pin. Another neat thing he did was instead of having a fixed position for the tool change he uses the ďtool change positionĒ DROs on the setup screen. This allows me to position the tool change at the most efficient spot for each setup.
Iím a big proponent of working out designs in 3D before committing to actual construction. The first thing I did was model my mill as closely as I could. I included the table and a couple of Kurt vises. You can download 3D files of the vises directly from Kurt. This allowed me to run the table through itís motions and get a better idea of what kind of envelope I had to work with.



Then I proceeded to model the rest of the components as I worked out all the motion and clearance issues. Although his kind of modeling takes time I find for me the end product is so much cleaner. Plus I build it a few times in the computer so when itís time for actual construction I have a good idea of what Iím doing. Most of the purchased components offered 3D files so this made things a lot easier.



Even 3D files of the pokeys were available.



The build was fairly straight forward. Most items were made from .5Ē thick 6061. I have a small anodizing line so I anodized everything. The extra holes in he parts are for mounting things if necessary. When I prototype I put extra drilled and tapped holes all over the place so that if I have to add something itís not a big deal.



I opted for a traditional fork design with tension spring to retain the tools. It took a few designs to get it to slide over the balance holes drilled in the tool holders.



I also engraved the tool slot numbers in the edge of the carousel. Not sure how well this will work when I get the cover on.



Using the 80/20 extrusions and cncrouterparts slides made designing things like brackets much easier to build. They have 3D models available for all their components.




Iíve done a few thousand tool changes in an actual machining environment and only had a few bumps and those were caught by the proximity system.The things Iím going to change are pretty minor. The main vertical movement is too short. The tools collide with my splash guard mounted on the table. I have plenty of height and the higher I can get the tools the less chance chip contamination there will be.  Coincidentally I didnít model the splash shield in my original model and now Iím paying the price. I also have a bit of tidying up to do but Iíll do that after the vertical mod.
Having an ATC has opened up a whole new set of things I can bid on and has already paid for the price of the parts in the few jobs Iíve done with it. Plus it was a gas to build and that in itself made it worth it.
Here's a couple of videos. The first one is a normal change with a 6000 rpm spindle speed and spindle indexing. The second one is an earlier macro before the indexing was hooked up but it shows the speed of the change.
Thanks for looking
Derek
http://youtu.be/Zcv-ej45Ka0
http://youtu.be/kxhk0KC6UjI
Logged
HimyKabibble
V4 Screen Contributor

Offline Offline

Posts: 1,687



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: December 27, 2012, 12:15:33 PM »

Very nice!  But I'm wondering why you don't use your quill?  I ran my knee mill for about 18 months using the knee as the Z axis, and, besides being painfully slow (50 IPM, compared to 250 on X/Y), I saw significant wear on the leadscrew and bevel gears, and it's not hugely accurate, due to lead error in the leadscrew.  I added a quill drive, which has been wonderful.  Now I use the knee to apply tool length compensation, so I always have full quill travel for every tool.

Just finished my own 10-tool ATC:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=54s0aoAT37o

It's great fun watching it work for the first few days, isn't it?

Regards,
Ray L.


* 2012-12-26_11-09-05_110 smaller.jpg (128.25 KB, 800x451 - viewed 684 times.)

* 2012-12-26_11-09-48_511 smaller.jpg (117.98 KB, 800x451 - viewed 609 times.)
Logged

Regards,
Ray L.
derek
Active Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 201


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: December 27, 2012, 12:28:20 PM »

Quote
Very nice!  But I'm wondering why you don't use your quill?  I ran my knee mill for about 18 months using the knee as the Z axis, and, besides being painfully slow (50 IPM, compared to 250 on X/Y), I saw significant wear on the leadscrew and bevel gears, and it's not hugely accurate, due to lead error in the leadscrew.  I added a quill drive, which has been wonderful.  Now I use the knee to apply tool length compensation, so I always have full quill travel for every tool.

I have gas springs on the knee so I have no trouble hitting 120 ipm with the knee. For the work I do it's plenty accurate. 15" of travel comes in pretty handy doing pattern work.

Quote
Just finished my own 10-tool ATC:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=54s0aoAT37o
Oh I've been following your exploits! I actually thought about the swing arm arrangement but because of space issues it didn't go very far for me.

Quote
It's great fun watching it work for the first few days, isn't it?

You got that right! For me it's been more of a "holy crap it actually works!!!" kind of thing.
Logged
HimyKabibble
V4 Screen Contributor

Offline Offline

Posts: 1,687



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: December 27, 2012, 12:35:54 PM »

What are you using to move the knee?  I've had, at various times, up to four gas springs on mine, but never got above 75 IPM, using an 850 oz-in DC servo driving through a 48:1 reduction: 5-pitch leadscrew, plus original bevel gears, plus a 4.8:1 belt reduction.  I assume you have a ballscrew on the knee?

Kinda funny....  I considered an approach similar to yours, but ruled it out due to space issues!  :-)  It would've required extending the table enclosure at least a foot further to one side to make room.

Regards,
Ray L.
Logged

Regards,
Ray L.
derek
Active Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 201


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: December 27, 2012, 12:46:38 PM »

Quote
What are you using to move the knee?  I've had, at various times, up to four gas springs on mine, but never got above 75 IPM, using an 850 oz-in DC servo driving through a 48:1 reduction: 5-pitch leadscrew, plus original bevel gears, plus a 4.8:1 belt reduction.  I assume you have a ballscrew on the knee?

I'm using an old Pacific Scientific treadmill motor and a Rutex 2020 drive. If I run it at 120 rapids the motor gets a little warm so I keep it at 100 so I have a little overhead. I'm not in that much of a hurry. I've been running it like this for at least 6 or 7 years. you can tell by the pictures the mill get's a lot of use.  Other than replacing the springs every so often it's been fine. I plan on changing over to pneumatic cylinders and a reservoir tank at some point.

Quote
Kinda funny....  I considered an approach similar to yours, but ruled it out due to space issues!  :-)  It would've required extending the table enclosure at least a foot further to one side to make room.

It's absolutely what works for one won't work for another type of thing.
Logged
angel tech
Active Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 508


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: December 27, 2012, 01:33:27 PM »

great atc, looks very similar to the denford system. One observation though, you will need to cover the gear drive on the carousel as it will hold swarf and jam up relatively easily, a geneva mechanism was introduced to get past this problem.
Logged
derek
Active Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 201


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: December 27, 2012, 01:42:15 PM »

great atc, looks very similar to the denford system. One observation though, you will need to cover the gear drive on the carousel as it will hold swarf and jam up relatively easily, a geneva mechanism was introduced to get past this problem.

Covers??? we don't need no stinkin covers!!!
Actually they're next on the list. I have a vacuum forming machine so I'm going to knock out a set from ABS.
Logged
Hood
Mach4 Alpha

Offline Offline

Posts: 25,733

Carnoustie, Scotland


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: December 27, 2012, 01:54:32 PM »

That is a nice changer, much prefer the motorised rotation myself Smiley
Hood
Logged
angel tech
Active Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 508


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: December 27, 2012, 02:52:00 PM »

i hate the geneva mechanism, but it does do the job when there's swarf about. The motor / gear drive is much nicer.
Logged
DeanoM
Active Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 52


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: December 28, 2012, 09:06:18 AM »

Looks looks a great thing.  Did you have to regrind the spindle to fit the bt30 gripper in?
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 »   Go Up
Print
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!