Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 20, 2008, 04:21:31 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
* Home Help Search Calendar Links Login Register
+  Machsupport Forum
|-+  Tangent Corner
| |-+  Tangent Corner
| | |-+  Product Idea (Your input needed)
Pages: 1 2 »   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Product Idea (Your input needed)  (Read 1432 times)
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Benny
Guest
« on: February 19, 2008, 09:20:29 PM »

I am considering making and selling control boxes and or escutcheons.
The boxes would not have any components attached, it would be the job of the buyer to mount their desired components.
They would be made of a durable plastic. Poly Prop I guess. The same stuff they use in kids playgrounds.

Would you consider such a product?
How much would you think was a fair price? $50 - 100?
How could the box be improved?
Am I barking up the wrong tree?

<a href="http://www.machsupport.com/forum/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=5890.0;id=4539" target="_blank">http://www.machsupport.com/forum/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=5890.0;id=4539</a>



* show1.jpg (33.13 KB, 568x342 - viewed 321 times.)

* show2.jpg (35.93 KB, 437x227 - viewed 320 times.)
« Last Edit: March 13, 2008, 10:34:29 PM by Benny » Logged
Hood
Active Member

Online Online

Posts: 4,779


Carnoustie, Scotland


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: February 20, 2008, 07:45:16 AM »

Look good Benny, durable plastic is a good idea, not sure the best type but I know ABS (Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene) is common on bikes for body panels, fairings etc. Its got a fairly good impact resistance and very nice surface finish.
 Personally I would be looking for a vertical style rather the horizontal in your drawings. The panels you have set aside for buttons etc would preferably be easily removable for drilling etc and would be a good idea if they could be bought seperately so that modifications at a later date would just be the simple matter of ordering the required panel.
 Screen size would be an important factor  for me as I always use touch screens so a min of 17inch and the way things are going now I think 19 might be preferable as dont think 17's will be easily obtained in the future. Think you would really need some form of mounting the screens in, this could be as simple as some standoffs in the back so that a metal strap could be secured with setscrews so maybe the standoff should have brass threaded inserts.
 Just a few thoughts.

Hood
Logged
Tweakie.CNC
Active Member

Online Online

Posts: 145


Super Kitty.


View Profile WWW
« Reply #2 on: February 20, 2008, 10:46:17 AM »

Hi Benny

Your suggested product really looks good but before you invest too much time and money into any venture you must be sure of your market. You could perhaps fill a football stadium with people and only find one person interested in CNC controllers whereas from the same crowd you may find many people interested in say children's toys for example.
All the best and good luck with any venture you choose.

Tweakie.
Logged

Why ?  because we believe that we can.
Benny
Guest
« Reply #3 on: February 24, 2008, 11:40:03 PM »

Should I design for a 21 inch wide screen monitor, since these seem to be the standard today?
Maybe a 19 inch traditional size since they are easier to get touch screens for?
Logged
Chaoticone
South Carolina, US
Administrator
*
Online Online

Posts: 2,798


Precision Chaos



View Profile WWW
« Reply #4 on: February 25, 2008, 06:49:14 AM »

Benny,
    A cut to fit replaceable panel would be best IMO.

Brett
Logged

Grin If you could see the things I have in my head, you would be laughing too. Grin
www.precisionchaos1.com
My guard dog is not what you need to worry about!
Overloaded
Global Moderator
*
Online Online

Posts: 1,116



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: February 25, 2008, 07:48:17 AM »

Hey Benny,
I'm with you on the Universal design.
Would it contain everything ?  IE: mother board, HDD, CD, power supplies, bob, drivers, and such ?
The VFD could be mounted elsewhere I suppose. Or maybe on the back of the enclosure.
Also, if you could supply a graphic that is to scale with appx. dims.
For instance, in your first post, if that monitor is 17", the unit would be over 3' wide. Just estimating, please verify. (well maybe not 3' but 2' + )
Looking Good Benny. I'm very interested,
RC
« Last Edit: February 25, 2008, 08:43:39 PM by Overloaded » Logged

You must learn from the mistakes of others. You cant possibly live long enough to make them all yourself.
Chaoticone
South Carolina, US
Administrator
*
Online Online

Posts: 2,798


Precision Chaos



View Profile WWW
« Reply #6 on: February 25, 2008, 08:33:27 PM »

Yup, the universal looks good.

Brett
Logged

Grin If you could see the things I have in my head, you would be laughing too. Grin
www.precisionchaos1.com
My guard dog is not what you need to worry about!
Graham Waterworth
Administrator
*
Online Online

Posts: 1,166


West Yorkshire, England



View Profile WWW
« Reply #7 on: February 26, 2008, 03:30:33 AM »

The universal looks OK but you have to remember that the roof lights and windows in some shops will cause the LCD to be bleached out, I had to have shrouds made for some of the machines so we could see the screens.

They are better mounted at 95 degrees than at 70.

Graham.
Logged

G-Code is on the cutting edge

Autovalues Engineering, CNC machining specialists, Bradford, England
Benny
Guest
« Reply #8 on: February 26, 2008, 03:51:31 AM »

Graham, did you get out a protractor on mine?
A shroud, brilliant suggestion. This is why I like getting others ideas.
Thanks
Logged
Graham Waterworth
Administrator
*
Online Online

Posts: 1,166


West Yorkshire, England



View Profile WWW
« Reply #9 on: February 26, 2008, 07:34:20 AM »

No protractor, its what us engineers call 'rack of the eye' or in Yorkshire 'rek u't e'

Graham.
Logged

G-Code is on the cutting edge

Autovalues Engineering, CNC machining specialists, Bradford, England
Pages: 1 2 »   Go Up
Print
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.7 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!