Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 28, 2012, 12:31:35 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
* Home Help Search Calendar Links Login Register
+  Machsupport Forum
|-+  Mach Discussion
| |-+  General Mach Discussion
| | |-+  Pobleme with G31 and axis compensation using formula
Pages: 1   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Pobleme with G31 and axis compensation using formula  (Read 187 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
rdpdo
Active Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 12


View Profile
« on: August 02, 2011, 11:36:01 AM »

Hello,

I am using compensation on XY axis with the formula for squarness compensation :

 X = X
 Y = Y + (X*0.005)
 Z = Z

With this setup, when I do a MDI "G0 Z1", only the Z axis is moving. It's ok...

Unfortenalty, when i do a MDI "G31 Z-0.5 F10" to probe a point, the Z axis AND the Y axis are moving... Sad

When I disable formula, I havent this problem...

Is is normal or a bug ?

Thanks for your help.

Regard.
Logged
Tweakie.CNC
Active Member

Online Online

Posts: 3,263


Super Kitty.


View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: August 02, 2011, 11:58:33 AM »

Hi rdpdo,

This thread perhaps relates to your problem as well. http://www.machsupport.com/forum/index.php/topic,19117.0.html

Tweakie.
Logged

Success consists of going from failure to failure without loss of enthusiasm.  Winston Churchill.
DaveCVI
V4 Screen Contributor

Offline Offline

Posts: 532



View Profile WWW
« Reply #2 on: August 02, 2011, 05:39:53 PM »

Hi,
This is an educated guess - I suspect it's a bug in Mach.
I say this because I've learned that Mach is not consistent about handling coordinate transformations when reporting G31 touch points. For example Mach does not handle Coordinate rotations and G31 correctly (where that means "mathematically correctly").

Since the formula you are using should be treated (from a math viewpoint) as a concatenated coordinate transformation, I have this gut level feeling that this could be another example of not all parts of mach uniformly handling all other parts of mach....

My suggestion would be to get a (as simple as possible) reproducible test case, write up the steps to show the problem and then contact Andrew at artsoft
Andrew is the first line bug checker these days - if you can show the problem to him, he can be the path to further action inside artsoft.

Dave
Logged

Author of the MachStdMill Extensions for Mach3
www.CalypsoVentures.com
rdpdo
Active Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 12


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: August 02, 2011, 06:40:41 PM »

Ok thanks you I'll send a message to andrew.
Logged
Pages: 1   Go Up
Print
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!