Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 27, 2012, 07:40:12 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
* Home Help Search Calendar Links Login Register
+  Machsupport Forum
|-+  Mach Discussion
| |-+  General Mach Discussion
| | |-+  Which probe is better.....?
Pages: 1   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Which probe is better.....?  (Read 459 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
jevs
Active Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 31


View Profile
« on: April 08, 2011, 12:33:35 AM »

I am looking for a probe to do digitizing and also edge and center finding etc. Which of these is better or more accurate?

http://www.wildhorse-innovations.com/index.php?_a=viewProd&productId=80

http://www.imsrv.com/deskcnc/probe.htm

Or should I be looking for something better? If so what would it be?
Logged
Hood
Active Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 17,366


Carnoustie, Scotland


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: April 08, 2011, 01:57:29 AM »

Check out Zarzuls probe, you will find the thread in the bargain basement section of the forum.

http://www.machsupport.com/forum/index.php/topic,5004.0.html

Hood
Logged
jevs
Active Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 31


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: April 08, 2011, 07:46:23 AM »

I beleive his probe is the first one I linked to at Wildhorse? I read all those posts, but I still don't know which of the two is better. One is nearly 3 times as expensive, but is it better (more accurate or better repeatability)?

Also are these probes even any good for edge finding, or are they not accurate enough?
Logged
Hood
Active Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 17,366


Carnoustie, Scotland


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: April 08, 2011, 08:32:40 AM »

I made my own probe and its very accurate, it is along the same lines as the ones you linked to, ie the 3 rod and ball type. I dont use it for probing and it was never my intention to use it for that, it was made for edge finding and is extremely repeatable, I have it true to less than 0.005mm and it will repeat at less than I can measure. So from that I would say there is no reason to think either of the two above would be any different.
Hood
Logged
BR549
Active Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 2,557


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: April 08, 2011, 02:53:16 PM »

I have used the IMSRV model for over 5 years without fail and it is VERY accurate.

(;-) TP
Logged
jevs
Active Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 31


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: April 08, 2011, 09:10:46 PM »

I ordered 2 of the wildhorse ones. I am going to dedicate one to tool setting and one to probing. I figure these are worth a shot since I can get two for less than one of the others that may not be any better....
Logged
Pages: 1   Go Up
Print
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!