Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 27, 2012, 12:04:54 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
* Home Help Search Calendar Links Login Register
+  Machsupport Forum
|-+  Mach Discussion
| |-+  General Mach Discussion
| | |-+  Tool Path display
Pages: « 1 2   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Tool Path display  (Read 828 times)
0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.
Hood
Active Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 17,358


Carnoustie, Scotland


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: September 30, 2010, 02:30:55 PM »

You also have a few outputs which share the same pins as the motors, so best sort that out as well.
Hood
Logged
egerber
Active Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 29


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: September 30, 2010, 04:25:11 PM »

Based on my interpretation of the configuration guide I believe it is configured correctly, I have attached the info for review.
The problem only seams to be when we change fixture offsets during any given program. If we just use G54 things run fine.

* Mach3Mill_1.84.pdf (5704.19 KB - downloaded 54 times.)
Logged
Hood
Active Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 17,358


Carnoustie, Scotland


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: September 30, 2010, 04:30:17 PM »

Please help me a little here, where about in the manual that you attached should I look?
Hood
Logged
egerber
Active Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 29


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: September 30, 2010, 04:40:10 PM »

The maping is on pages 32 thru 37 covers each section
Logged
Hood
Active Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 17,358


Carnoustie, Scotland


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: September 30, 2010, 04:44:51 PM »

Have you attached the correct manual? That is the standard Mach manual and I can assure you that when using the parallel port, or as far as I know, any other external device with Mach, you can not share ports and pins especially if you are specifying some of them as Inputs and some as outputs.
Hood
« Last Edit: September 30, 2010, 04:46:23 PM by Hood » Logged
egerber
Active Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 29


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: September 30, 2010, 05:15:43 PM »

Yes I attached the wrong manual, I am currently geeting all the configuration info confired. I will send when I have all the data correct
Sorry for the confusion, FIY this is an either net connection
Logged
Hood
Active Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 17,358


Carnoustie, Scotland


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: September 30, 2010, 05:19:12 PM »

Ok I am at this time reading the DSPC manual that I have just downloaded and it seems that it indeed can be configured all as port 1 but the actual wires connect to different connectors on the DSPMC.

I am afraid I wont be able to test things here as I dont have the DSPMC Sad
Have you talked to the DSPMC people about this as I suspect it may be a plugin issue.
Hood
Logged
egerber
Active Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 29


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: September 30, 2010, 05:38:51 PM »

OK I have attached a config pdf witch has the current I/O connections for the DSPMC controller showing the mapping. I have also attached the correct manual for the DSPMC,
Thank you again for your help

* dspMCv2_3.pdf (1047.49 KB - downloaded 39 times.)
* Config.pdf (1892.58 KB - downloaded 28 times.)
Logged
Hood
Active Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 17,358


Carnoustie, Scotland


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: September 30, 2010, 05:48:01 PM »

As said in my last post I am afraid I cant test due to me not having a DSPMC Sad
Have you asked DSPMC people about this as it seems to me it may be a plugin issue.
Maybe a post on the DSPMC part of the forum will get answers if you have not already cdone so.
Hood
Logged
Hood
Active Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 17,358


Carnoustie, Scotland


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: October 01, 2010, 02:46:52 PM »

Just been looking at your xml again and see you have strange values for the SoftLimits. This may again be meant to be that way due to it being a DSPMC but normally with any other device I have seen you would have zero for X and Y min and Z Max and then X and Y Max would be the travel distance and Z Min would also be the travel but as a negative value.
Just wondering if that might be your problem?

Hood
Logged
Pages: « 1 2   Go Up
Print
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!