Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 27, 2012, 01:10:37 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
* Home Help Search Calendar Links Login Register
+  Machsupport Forum
|-+  Mach Discussion
| |-+  General Mach Discussion
| | |-+  size issues
Pages: 1 2 »   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: size issues  (Read 539 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Bill_O
Active Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 104



View Profile
« on: September 07, 2010, 06:30:42 PM »

I am working on a router that has a problem making diamond shapes correct. If a square is cut along just x and y moves the sizes are even. If the same square is rotated 45 deg, 2 sides are long and 2 sides are short. The long sides are on opposite sides of the square and so are the short sides. I need help with this bad.
Thanks,
Bill
Logged
Tweakie.CNC
Active Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 3,261


Super Kitty.


View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: September 08, 2010, 01:41:51 AM »

Bill,

Are you using 'Local System Rotated' (MDI page) to rotated your square code ?.

Tweakie.
Logged

Success consists of going from failure to failure without loss of enthusiasm.  Winston Churchill.
RICH
Global Moderator
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 4,707




View Profile
« Reply #2 on: September 08, 2010, 04:58:47 AM »

What happens when you try to do a  circle?
Is it egg shaped?
How much difference in the sides?

RICH
Logged
Bill_O
Active Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 104



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: September 08, 2010, 05:11:48 AM »

Tweakie,
I am rotating the file in my g code software. I also plotted the g code points into autocad to ensure they were correct.

Rich,
A circle does the same thing. Small and large on the same sides.

Thanks,
Bill
Logged
RICH
Global Moderator
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 4,707




View Profile
« Reply #4 on: September 08, 2010, 05:32:33 AM »

You don't say how much difference. I am thinking that's it's a mechanical  / steps per unit issue............
The axis system ( ie; say motor, rack or screw may not be linear...can even be different going the opposite direction ) steps per unit may vary
and you have set them based on some distance.
I would set up an indicator, run gcode for around a circle ( four arcs), put a pause in at say the 90 degrees and look at the difference.  
You can only do so much to refine the steps per unit and that would be a comprimise of small to large movements.

If things were perfect, like exactly matched axis systems with the same steps per unit, no backlash etc., then the combined movements  would be
produce a perfect square or circle. So there is steps per unit ( lets say software setting ) and the mechanical side ( lets say the axis system  / each axis component contributes  to total ) which one or combination  is not perfect .......only you can explore to find out. Depends on how anal you want to be about it all.......


RICH
« Last Edit: September 08, 2010, 05:42:57 AM by RICH » Logged
rcaffin
Active Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 280


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: September 08, 2010, 05:42:13 AM »

I am working on a router that has a problem making diamond shapes correct. If a square is cut along just x and y moves the sizes are even. If the same square is rotated 45 deg, 2 sides are long and 2 sides are short. The long sides are on opposite sides of the square and so are the short sides.

Can you post a photo of a good square, a rotated square, and a circle please? This sounds a little bit odd.

Cheers
Logged
Tweakie.CNC
Active Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 3,261


Super Kitty.


View Profile WWW
« Reply #6 on: September 08, 2010, 05:49:25 AM »

Bill,

What GCode software are you using ?.

It could be that there is axis scaling built into your software.

Tweakie.
Logged

Success consists of going from failure to failure without loss of enthusiasm.  Winston Churchill.
RICH
Global Moderator
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 4,707




View Profile
« Reply #7 on: September 08, 2010, 05:50:36 AM »

Cheers,
Just do some testing with your machine and see how well it does.
Even an old machine can be tweaked to achieve some fine results for one  particular machine operation.
We live in a computerized machining world and forget that some practical experience goes a long way to achieving the sought after perfection.

RICH
Logged
Bill_O
Active Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 104



View Profile
« Reply #8 on: September 08, 2010, 08:04:58 AM »

rich,
I have been doing some testing and not getting anywhere. very slow cuts and accels make no difference. less than .001 inches of backlash.

Tweakie,
Enroute. i ploted the gcode points in autocad and they are correct.

rcaffin,
you would not see anything in a photo. the differences are about + or - .015 inches.

Thanks,
bill
Logged
Overloaded
Global Moderator
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 3,072



View Profile
« Reply #9 on: September 08, 2010, 10:39:49 AM »

Hi Bill,
  What is the actual resolution of the X and Y axis of your machine ?
Steps per.....inch or mm ?
Curious,
Russ
Logged

"I haven't failed. I've just found 10,000 ways that won't work."         Edison

"You cannot help men permanently by doing for them what they could and should do for themselves."
Abe Lincoln
Pages: 1 2 »   Go Up
Print
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!