Y, U, V Change X DRO

[Csabika]

Hi!

how macro to be any axis in g code the x-axis move?
If G code Y300 you move X-axis 300
              U300 you move X-axis 300

thanks
Csaba

[Tweakie.CNC]

Hi Csaba,

Not quite sure what you are saying here.

Y300 will move the Y axis and DRO
U300 will move the A axis and DRO

Could you perhaps explain in more detail please ?

Tweakie.

[Csabika]

Hi Tweakie!


Not.

Any axis is G code, always  move the X axis and XDRO
the code line by line with the movements.
G code: G0 X500      '  move x axis 500mm
                X800      ' move x axis 800mm
             M01
            G0 Y600      ' move x axis 600mm
            M01
            G0 U1100    ' move x axis 1100mm
            M01

This is because it should be a panel sizing machines, and there is only one axis
but the cam software works at four levels, when the signal changes (x-y  x-u  x-v)
is waiting for an external signal.

Regards Csaba

[Tweakie.CNC]

Hi Csaba,

Perhaps someone else can figure this one out but I really can't understand exactly what you are doing or just why you would use multi-axis software / GCode just to control one machine axis.

I know it's not resolving your problem but I would like to understand (assuming it's not totally beyond me) exactly what you are doing with this machine.

Tweakie.

[KTM]

In ports and pins, set your x axis, y axis and a axis output the same and set the tuning as the same, as long as you do not move the axes at the same time, it should work.
eg: step pin # 7
     dir pin # 6

Regards

Steve

[Csabika]

Hi Steve!

problem with me using it, motion control DSPMC and can not be given the same number of output shaft.

Regards Csaba

[Csabika]

Someone help please very important.

Csaba

[KTM]

Is there any specific reason why you are using the DSPMC instead of the parallel port break out board?

[stirling]

Csaba

I'm with Tweakie on this. Why are you generating code that is unsuitable for your machine? This just doesn't seem the right way to go about things and it sounds potentially dangerous too.

sometimes it's better to ask for solutions to the actual problem rather than asking how to implement your solution to a problem you havn't told us about.

Ian

[Csabika]

Hi Ian!

I used to be so because the optimizer does the code.

KTM!
The dspmc be because the enginedriver analog + / - 10V

Csaba